Yaakubov v. SRA Associates, Inc.
| Dina Yaakubov |
| SRA Associates, Inc. and SRA Associates, Inc. doing business as SRA Associates of New Jersey |
| 1:2019cv03948 |
| July 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Lois Bloom |
| William F Kuntz |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: The Court shall hold the initial conference in plaintiff's FDCPA case on October 3, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 11A South of the United States Courthouse, 225 Cadman Plaza East, Brooklyn, New York 11201. The parties shall exchange their Rule 26(a)(1) initial disclosures and file a 26(f) Meeting Report by September 26, 2019. Parties are advised that they must contact each other before making any request for an adjournment to the Court. Any request for an adjournment must be electronically filed with the Court at least forty-eight (48) hours before the scheduled conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom on 8/21/2019. (Burks, Jory)
|
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by SRA Associates, Inc. (Smith, Kirsten) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by SRA Associates, Inc.. (Smith, Kirsten) |
| Filing 7 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint by SRA Associates, Inc.. (Smith, Kirsten) |
|
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. So Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 8/6/2019. (Douglas, Maura)
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dina Yaakubov. SRA Associates, Inc. served on 7/16/2019, answer due 8/6/2019. (Barshay, David) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to SRA Associates, Inc.. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Case Assigned to Judge William F. Kuntz, II and Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by David M. Barshay on behalf of Dina Yaakubov (aty to be noticed) (Barshay, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SRA Associates, Inc. filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11644468 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Dina Yaakubov. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons) (Sanders, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
