City of New York v. Cigarettes Unlimited, L.C. et al
| City of New York |
| Robert A. Schmidt, Cigarettes Unlimited, L.C., Mary Riley, Thomas Guglielmo, Julius Peters-Brandon, John or Jane Doe 1-30, Derrick L Whiting, Joanna S. Petties, Monique Pearson, Jessica Whitehead, Margaret L. Clark, Paula K. Sloan, Debra A. Antico, Anita Lash, Shana L. Biller, Stephen D. Riley, Candice S. Fox, Razik K Sharki, Elizabeth R. Windham, Meryle McGowan, Joseph N. Antico and John A. Lash, III |
| 1:2019cv03998 |
| July 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| I Leo Glasser |
| Roanne L Mann |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 SUMMONS Returned Executed by City of New York. Mary Riley served on 8/14/2019, answer due 9/30/2019. (Proshansky, Eric) |
| Filing 21 SUMMONS Returned Executed by City of New York. Stephen D. Riley served on 8/14/2019, answer due 9/30/2019. (Proshansky, Eric) |
| Filing 20 SUMMONS Returned Executed by City of New York. John A. Lash, III served on 8/15/2019, answer due 9/30/2019. (Proshansky, Eric) |
| Filing 19 SUMMONS Returned Executed by City of New York. Anita Lash served on 8/15/2019, answer due 9/30/2019. (Proshansky, Eric) |
| Incorrect/Document/Entry Information: re DE's 19,20,21,22. Filer used incorrect event. Was instructed to use "Return Of Service Executed" as to each individual party. (Layne, Monique) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Justin M. Sher on behalf of Shana L. Biller, Cigarettes Unlimited, L.C., Margaret L. Clark, Candice S. Fox, Anita Lash, John A. Lash, III, Monique Pearson, Julius Peters-Brandon, Joanna S. Petties, Mary Riley, Stephen D. Riley, Paula K. Sloan, Derrick L Whiting, Elizabeth R. Windham (aty to be noticed) (Sher, Justin) |
Filing 17
ORDER granting #16 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Shana L. Biller answer due 9/30/2019; Cigarettes Unlimited, L.C. answer due 9/30/2019; Margaret L. Clark answer due 9/30/2019; Candice S. Fox answer due 9/30/2019; Anita Lash answer due 9/30/2019; John A. Lash, III answer due 9/30/2019; Monique Pearson answer due 9/30/2019; Julius Peters-Brandon answer due 9/30/2019; Joanna S. Petties answer due 9/30/2019; Mary Riley answer due 9/30/2019; Stephen D. Riley answer due 9/30/2019; Paula K. Sloan answer due 9/30/2019; Derrick L Whiting answer due 9/30/2019; Elizabeth R. Windham answer due 9/30/2019. Ordered by Judge I. Leo Glasser on 8/20/2019. (Kessler, Stanley)
|
| Filing 16 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint and Stipulation to Accept Service by City of New York. (Proshansky, Eric) |
| Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed by City of New York. Joanna S. Petties served on 8/6/2019, answer due 8/27/2019. (Proshansky, Eric) |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by City of New York. Margaret L. Clark served on 8/6/2019, answer due 8/27/2019. (Proshansky, Eric) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by City of New York. Robert A. Schmidt served on 7/30/2019, answer due 8/20/2019. (Proshansky, Eric) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by City of New York. Meryle McGowan served on 7/18/2019, answer due 8/8/2019. (Proshansky, Eric) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by City of New York. Razik K Sharki served on 7/23/2019, answer due 8/13/2019. (Proshansky, Eric) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by City of New York. Debra A. Antico served on 7/18/2019, answer due 8/8/2019. (Proshansky, Eric). Modified on 7/24/2019 to correct date served/answer due date. (Layne, Monique). |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by City of New York. Thomas Guglielmo served on 7/16/2019, answer due 8/6/2019. (Proshansky, Eric) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 7 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 6 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 5 FILING FEE: $ 400.00, receipt number 4653141717 (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Case Assigned to Judge I. Leo Glasser and Chief Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 4 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint by City of New York (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A -- Defs. Names and addresses) (Proshansky, Eric) . |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint by City of New York (Proshansky, Eric) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants $ 400 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -yes,, filed by City of New York. (Proshansky, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
