Connor v. 4T USA Inc.
Mary Connor |
4T USA Inc. d/b/a Mi Garba, 4T USA Inc. and 4T USA Inc. doing business as Mi Garba |
1:2019cv04433 |
August 1, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brian M Cogan |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Bruno Cilio on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Cilio, Bruno) |
ORDER. The Initial Status Conference is reset to 10/7/2019 at 11:30 am in Chambers 704S and the parties are reminded to comply with the mandatory requirements previously posted. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 9/17/2019. (Weisberg, Peggy) |
Filing 7 First MOTION to Adjourn Conference by Mary Connor. (Solotoff, Darryn) |
ORDER granting in part and denying in part #7 . Plaintiff has failed to comply with this Court's Individual Practice Rules requiring 48 hours' notice of any request for adjournment. In addition, despite plaintiff's reference to "defendant's counsel," defendant is in default as no attorney has appeared. In light of these facts, the Initial Status Conference is adjourned to 9/18/2019 at 5:30 p.m., provided that if plaintiff files a request for entry of default with the Clerk or if defendant appears prior to that time, the Initial Status Conference will be further adjourned. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 9/16/2019. (Weisberg, Peggy) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mary Connor. All Defendants. (Solotoff, Darryn) |
Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Status Conference is set for 9/17/2019 at 4:45 PM in Chambers 704S. SEE ATTACHED MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONFERENCE. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 8/5/2019. (Weisberg, Peggy) |
Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to 4T USA Inc.. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT /SUMMONS against All Defendants filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11728562 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -yes,, filed by Mary Connor. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Solotoff, Darryn) |
Case assigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.