Wilson v. Weinstein
| Hasson Wilson |
| Harvey Weinstein |
| 1:2019cv04541 |
| July 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Lois Bloom |
| Kiyo A Matsumoto |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER DISMISSING CASE, By letter dated September 9, 2019, plaintiffrequests dismissal of this action. (ECF No. 6, PI. Ltr. ) Accordingly, the court grants plaintiff's request and this action is voluntarily dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) (1) (A) (i) as defendant has neitherappeared, answered, nor moved for summary judgment. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this matter and send A copy of this Order to plaintiff and note service on the docket. (Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 9/17/2019) C/M (Galeano, Sonia)
|
| Filing 6 Letter dated 9/9/19 from Hasson Wilson to Clerk of the Court, informing the Court that pltff no longer seeks to pursue this action and would like the action to be dismissed. (Galeano, Sonia) |
| Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 4 Notice to Pay Civil Filing Fee - Prisoner Case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (as amended July 26, 1996), plaintiff/petitioner is proceeding in forma pauperis and must pay the total $350 fee by monthly installments deducted from plaintiffs/petitioners prison trust fund account (or institutional equivalent). Original letter sent to the Warden/Superintendent of Correctional Facility. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Authorization (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Hasson Wilson. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Harvey Weinstein, filed by Hasson Wilson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wilson v. Weinstein | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Harvey Weinstein | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Hasson Wilson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
