Ygudayev v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc.
Boris Ygudayev |
Santander Consumer USA, Inc. and Santander Consumer USA, Inc. doing business as Chrysler Capital |
1:2019cv05027 |
September 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brian M Cogan |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice and Agreement to Arbitrate. ( Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 10/10/2019 ) (Guzzi, Roseann) |
Filing 9 Letter re:Proposed Stipulation & Order by Santander Consumer USA, Inc. (Goldstein, Philip) |
ORDER granting #8 Letter Motion for Pre Motion Conference. Plaintiff will file a detailed response to defendant's letter by 10/7/2019. A Premotion Conference on defendant's anticipated motion to compel arbitration, and in the alternative, a motion to dismiss the complaint will be held in conjunction with the Initial Status Conference which is reset to 10/10/2019 at 5:00 pm in Courtroom 8D South. The submission of the mandatory requirements for the initial conference is waived. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 10/2/2019. (Weisberg, Peggy) |
Filing 8 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference by Santander Consumer USA, Inc.. (Goldstein, Philip) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Philip A. Goldstein on behalf of Santander Consumer USA, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Goldstein, Philip) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Boris Ygudayev. Santander Consumer USA, Inc. served on 9/12/2019, answer due 10/3/2019. (Force, David) |
Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Status Conference is set for 10/21/2019 at 11:15 AM in Chambers 704S. SEE ATTACHED MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONFERENCE. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 9/5/2019. (Weisberg, Peggy) |
Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Santander Consumer USA, Inc.. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Santander Consumer USA, Inc. filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11815115 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -no,, filed by Boris Ygudayev. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Force, David) |
Case assigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.