Patel et al v. Barr et al
| Arpana Patel and Patel A. Gautambhai |
| Michael R. Pompeo, Phillip Slattery, Robert Batchelder and William P. Barr |
| 1:2019cv05176 |
| September 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| William F Kuntz |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Sheldon A. Smith on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Smith, Sheldon) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Phillip Slattery, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Lee, Tiffeny) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to William P. Barr, Robert Batchelder, Michael R. Pompeo, Phillip Slattery, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Summon, #2 Summon) (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Case Assigned to Judge William F. Kuntz, II. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION #2 for Refund of Fees Paid Electronically APPROVED by August Marziliano, Operations Manager on 9/12/2019. (Marziliano, August) (Main Document 3 replaced on 9/17/2019) (Marziliano, August). APPLICATION #2 for Refund of Fees Paid Electronically APPROVED by August Marziliano, Operations Manager on 9/12/2019. (Marziliano, August) (Main Document 3 replaced on 9/17/2019) (Marziliano, August). |
| Email Notification Test - DO NOT REPLY (Levine, Evelyn) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Refund of Fees Paid Electronically by Patel A. Gautambhai, Arpana Patel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Payment Confirmation) (Zahedi, Parham) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Writ of Mandamus against Arpana Patel, Patel A. Gautambhai filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11837275 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Arpana Patel, Patel A. Gautambhai. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Michael Pompeo, #3 Proposed Summons Phillip Slattery, #4 Proposed Summons Robert Batchelder, #5 Proposed Summons William Barr, #6 Exhibit I-130 Approval, #7 Exhibit Visa Appointment Confirmation, #8 Exhibit I-601 Approval, #9 Exhibit I-201 Approval, #10 Exhibit Consulate General Letter to Counsel) (Zahedi, Parham) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
