Heredia v. City of New York
| Diego Heredia |
| Corporation Counsel For The City Of New York, Det. Thomas Donegan, City of New York, P.O. Brian Wilson, A.D.A. Zachary Weintraub, Det. Thomas Cozart, New York City Police Department and P.O. John Does 1-20 |
| 1:2019cv05227 |
| September 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| LaShann DeArcy Hall |
| Steven Tiscione |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE by Diego Heredia to change email address (Marino, Nora) |
| Email Notification Test - DO NOT REPLY (Ramesar, Thameera) |
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to December 6, 2019 to Answer for Defendants City of New York and Assistant District Attorney Weintraub. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione on 10/8/2019. (Vasquez, Lea)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Defendant City writes jointly with counsel for defendant Assistant District Attorney Zachary Weintraub to respectfully request a 60-day enlargement of time, until December 6, 2019, to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. by City of New York. (DeCastro, Maria) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Maria Fernanda DeCastro on behalf of City of New York (aty to be noticed) (DeCastro, Maria) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Patricia Jean Bailey on behalf of Zachary Weintraub (aty to be noticed) (Bailey, Patricia) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| CIVIL CASE FILING FEE: $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11851500 (Evans, Sarah) |
| The case of Heredia v. City of New York et al, has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. The case number is 19cv5227. PLEASE NOTE: You must pay the case filing fee within seven (7) days. Select the event (Civil Case Filing Fee) and pay online. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Case assigned to Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall and Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants (made by defendants City of New York and NYPD, with consent of all other individually named defendants) from Queens Supreme Court, case number 711882/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A - F, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Evans, Sarah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
