Maldonado v. Redlyn Electric Corp. et al
| Luis Maldonado |
| Redlyn Electric Corp. d/b/a Louis Shiffman Electric, Sam Cuervas, Redlyn Electric Corp. and Redlyn Electric Corp. doing business as Louis Shiffman Electric |
| 1:2019cv05270 |
| September 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Dora Lizette Irizarry |
| Robert M Levy |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1201 Civil Rights (Disability) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by H. Joseph Cronen on behalf of Luis Maldonado (aty to be noticed) (Cronen, H.) |
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Conference set for 12/19/2019 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 11B South before Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy on 11/4/2019. (Attachments: #1 IC Questionnaire, #2 Individual Rules) (Marino, Janine)
|
|
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer as to All Defendants. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy on 11/4/2019. (Marino, Janine)
|
| Filing 8 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Sam Cuervas, Redlyn Electric Corp.. (Braverman, Marc) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Marc David Braverman on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Braverman, Marc) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Luis Maldonado. Redlyn Electric Corp. served on 10/15/2019, answer due 11/5/2019. (Phillips, William) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Luis Maldonado. Sam Cuervas served on 10/15/2019, answer due 11/5/2019. (Phillips, William) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry and Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sam Cuervas, Redlyn Electric Corp. d/b/a Louis Shiffman Electric filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11851758 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -N/A,, filed by Sam Cuervas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - NRTS, #2 Exhibit B - Letter to NYCCHR and NYC Law Department, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons) (Clark, Shawn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
