Dupuy v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
| MARIE DUPUY |
| Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. |
| 1:2019cv05294 |
| September 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| LaShann DeArcy Hall |
| James Orenstein |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
STIPULATION AND ORDER to remand action to State Court and Cap damages #9 Motion to Remand to State Court. ( Ordered by Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall on 10/11/2019 ) *Certified copy mailed to Kings, Supreme. (Guzzi, Roseann)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Remand to State Court and Cap Damages (Stipulation and Order) by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.. (Giacopelli, Michael) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER -- In the above captioned case, the Clerk's Office received notice that plaintiff's counsel Andrew Dellaripa, Esq. is not admitted to practice in the Eastern District of New York or registered to receive ECF notifications. Mr. Dellaripa is respectfully directed to apply for admission pro hac vice if he wishes to continue as counsel of record in this case, see Loc. Civ. R. 1.3(c), and to register to receive ECF notifications. Registration requires registering for ECF and filing a notice of appearance in this case. Failure to comply with this order may result in sanctions. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James Orenstein on 9/24/2019. c/m to Andrew Dellaripa, Esq. (Guy, Alicia)
|
|
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(a), I order the parties to appear for an initial discovery planning conference on, October 23, 2019, at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 11D South of the United States Courthouse, 225 Cadman Plaza East, Brooklyn, New York. No later than October 21, 2019, the parties must submit, by means of electronic filing on the court's ECF (Electronic Case Filing) system, a joint proposed discovery plan. Each party's counsel must be personally prepared to discuss all factual and legal issues in the case, including the possibility of settlement; otherwise, the client must attend in person as well. SEE ATTACHED ORDER. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James Orenstein on 9/24/2019. c/m to Andrew Dellaripa, Esq.. (Guy, Alicia)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by David M. Pollack on behalf of Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Pollack, David) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Nathan Giacopelli on behalf of Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Giacopelli, Michael) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Case Assigned to Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall and Magistrate Judge James Orenstein. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. identifying Corporate Parent The Home Depot, Inc. for Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.. (Kelly, Meagan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. from NY Supreme - Kings County, case number 508700/2019. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ANYEDC-11856894) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - Summons & Complaint, #2 Exhibit Ex. B - Affidavit of Service, #3 Exhibit Ex. C - Home Depot's Answer to Plaintiff's Verified Complaint, #4 Exhibit Ex. D - Demand for Supplemental Statement of Damages, #5 Exhibit Ex. E - Email confirmation of Settlement Demand, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (Kelly, Meagan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dupuy v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MARIE DUPUY | |
| Represented By: | Andrew Dellaripa |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Meagan M. Kelly |
| Represented By: | Michael Nathan Giacopelli |
| Represented By: | David M. Pollack |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
