Triplenet Pricing LLC et al Skullcandy, Inc.
| Triplenet Pricing LLC |
| Skullcandy, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv05508 |
| September 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brian M Cogan |
| Trademark |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Minute Entry and Order for Pre-motion Conference held on 11/22/2019 before Brian M. Cogan. The Court encouraged the parties to come to an agreement on the appropriate venue so the Court may transfer the case to the District Court in Utah or Delaware. If an agreement cannot be reached, defendant's motion for transfer of venue is due 12/6/2019; opposition is due 12/20/2019; and reply, if any, is due 12/27/2019. See transcript for details. (Court Reporter: Sophie Nolan). (Weisberg, Peggy) |
| Filing 14 Letter re pre-motion conference by Triplenet Pricing LLC (Antar, Solomon) |
| Filing 13 Letter Joint Letter in Connection with Initial Status Conference by Skullcandy, Inc. (Kloss, William) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by William Darrell Kloss, Jr on behalf of Skullcandy, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Kloss, William) |
ORDER granting #11 William D. Kloss, Jr.'s Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as counsel for defendant. The attorney shall register for ECF, registration is available online at www.pacer.gov. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that he receives electronic notification of activity in this case. Also, the attorney shall ensure the $150 admission fee be submitted to the Clerks Office via filing the event Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 11/16/2019. (Weisberg, Peggy)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for William D. Kloss, Jr. Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-12064056. by Skullcandy, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of William D. Kloss, Jr.) (Lee, Michael) |
|
ORDER denying #10 Motion for Pre Motion Conference. There is no need to hold a hearing on a proposed motion to admit an attorney pro hac vice. Instead, the attorney who wishes to be admitted pro hac vice must file a motion for leave to appear pro hac vice that complies with the Court's Local Rule 1.3(c). Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 11/13/2019. (Weisberg, Peggy)
|
| Filing 10 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference requesting that attorney William D. Kloss, Jr. be admitted pro hac vice by Skullcandy, Inc.. (Lee, Michael) |
|
SCHEDULING ORDER: Plaintiff is directed to file a detailed response to defendant's #9 letter by 11/18/2019. A Premotion Conference on defendant's proposed motion to dismiss will be held in conjunction with the Initial Status Conference which is reset to 11/22/2019 at 12:00 pm in Courtroom 8D South. The submission of a case management plan is waived, but the parties are reminded to submit a joint summary letter in accordance with the mandatory requirements set forth at #5 . Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 11/12/2019. (Weisberg, Peggy)
|
| Filing 9 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference concerning defendant's intended motion to dismiss the herein Complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b) by Skullcandy, Inc.. (Lee, Michael) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Triplenet Pricing LLC. Skullcandy, Inc. served on 10/15/2019, answer due 11/5/2019. (Antar, Solomon) |
|
ORDER granting in part #7 . The Court does not delay matters for settlement discussions since the parties are free to settle at any time. In addition, this case is going to move a lot faster than defendant apparently anticipates. The time to respond to the complaint is extended to 11/26/2019 and the Initial Status Conference is adjourned to 11/26/2019 at 11:15 am in Chambers 704S. Parties are reminded to comply with the mandatory requirements for the conference set forth at #5 . Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 11/4/2019. (Weisberg, Peggy)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer and adjournment of the November 12, 2019 Initial Conference by Skullcandy, Inc.. (Lee, Michael) |
| Filing 6 First MOTION to Adjourn Conference , First MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Triplenet Pricing LLC. (Antar, Solomon) |
|
ORDER denying #6 . Plaintiff chose to sue these defendants separately, and Judge Donnelly, as the judge with the low-numbered case, has not determined that the cases are related. The Court will defer to Judge Donnelly should she determine that the cases are related. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 10/30/2019. (Weisberg, Peggy)
|
|
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Status Conference is set for 11/12/2019 at 12:00 PM in Chambers 704S. SEE ATTACHED MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONFERENCE. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 10/1/2019. (Weisberg, Peggy)
|
| Filing 4 Notice of Report on the filing of an action regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Attachments: #1 complaint) (Rocco, Christine) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Skullcandy, Inc.. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| The has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. PLEASE NOTE: You must pay the case filing fee within seven (7) days. Select the event (Civil Case Filing Fee) and pay online. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| CIVIL CASE FILING FEE: $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11893782 (Antar, Solomon) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Skullcandy, Inc., filed by Triplenet Pricing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Davis, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Triplenet Pricing LLC et al Skullcandy, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Skullcandy, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | William Darrell Kloss, Jr |
| Represented By: | Michael Lee |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Triplenet Pricing LLC | |
| Represented By: | Solomon E. Antar |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
