Bishop v. Rodriguez Beato et al
Plaintiff: Lambert B. Bishop
Defendant: Cowan Systems, LLC and Julio A. Rodriguez Beato
Case Number: 1:2019cv05614
Filed: October 3, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: I Leo Glasser
Referring Judge: Steven Tiscione
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2019 Filing 10 Minute Entry for Initial Conference Hearing held on 11/18/2019 before Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione: Vakarev for Plaintiff; Kingsley for Defendants. The Court sets the following discovery deadlines: Deadline for completion of Rule 26(a) initial disclosures - 11/7/19; Completion of Phase I discovery - 1/20/20; Deadline for motions to join new parties or amend pleadings - 1/30/20; First requests for production of documents and interrogatories due by - 2/13/20; All fact discovery to be completed by 6/1/20; Exchange of expert reports - 7/1/20; Expert depositions completed by - 7/31/20; All discovery completed by - 8/8/20; Final date to take first step in dispositive motion practice - 9/8/20. At the request of the parties, the case will be referred to the Court-Annexed Mediation Program pursuant to Local Rule 83.8. Mediator to be selected by December 4, 2019. Mediation shall be completed by February 28, 2020. Parties shall file a joint status report by March 6, 2020. (FTR Log #3:22 - 3:25.) (Vasquez, Lea)
November 4, 2019 Filing 9 Proposed Scheduling Order re: Discovery Plan Worksheet by Cowan Systems, LLC, Julio A. Rodriguez Beato (Segal, Jeffrey)
November 4, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #8 Motion to Adjourn Conference: The initial conference scheduled for November 8th will instead be held at 3:30 p.m. on November 18, 2019. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione on 11/4/2019. (Vasquez, Lea)
November 1, 2019 Filing 8 First MOTION to Adjourn Conference on November 8, 2019 by Lambert B. Bishop. (Vakarev, Peter)
October 16, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Peter Vakarev on behalf of Lambert B. Bishop (aty to be noticed) (Vakarev, Peter)
October 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SCHEDULING ORDER: An in-person initial conference will be held at 11:30 a.m. on November 8, 2019 before the undersigned in Hearing Room N504 in the North Wing. All counsel must attend. Counsel are directed to complete the attached Discovery Plan Worksheet and electronically file same with the Court no later than November 6th. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione on 10/11/2019. (Vasquez, Lea)
October 11, 2019 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Cowan Systems, LLC, Julio A. Rodriguez Beato. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Segal, Jeffrey)
October 4, 2019 Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly)
October 4, 2019 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly)
October 4, 2019 Case Assigned to Judge I. Leo Glasser and Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly)
October 3, 2019 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Cowan Systems, LLC (Segal, Jeffrey)
October 3, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Cowan Systems, LLC from Supreme Court of the State of New York Kings County, case number 518213/2019. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number BNYEDC-11909983) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A) (Segal, Jeffrey).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bishop v. Rodriguez Beato et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cowan Systems, LLC
Represented By: Jeffrey A. Segal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Julio A. Rodriguez Beato
Represented By: Jeffrey A. Segal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lambert B. Bishop
Represented By: Aleksandr Vakarev
Represented By: Peter Vakarev
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?