Nersten v. Saul
| Nersten J Keith and Keith J. Nersten |
| Comm'r Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul |
| 1:2019cv05695 |
| October 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Ann M Donnelly |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Adam Osborn on behalf of Keith J. Nersten (aty to be noticed) (Osborn, Daniel) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nersten J. Keith. Andrew M. Saul served on 10/16/2019, answer due 12/16/2019. (Persaud, Sharmine) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Paulina Stamatelos on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (aty to be noticed) (Stamatelos, Paulina) |
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER: Defendant shall file the administrative record, which will constitute Defendants answer, or otherwise move against the complaint by January 6, 2020. Plaintiff shall file and serve a motion for judgment on the pleadings by March 6, 2020; Defendant shall file and serve its response to Plaintiffs motion, which response must contain a full recitation of the relevant facts and underlying administrative proceedings, by May 5, 2020; and Plaintiff shall file and serve a reply, if any, by May 26, 2020. The parties are to comply in all respects with applicable Local Rules for this district and this Courts Individual Practices and Rules, including but not limited to the Courts Individual Practice and Rules 1(D) and (C) regarding proper courtesy copy procedure and legal memorandum pages limitations (i.e., 25 pages for opening and opposition briefs, and 10 pages for reply briefs). The parties are reminded to ensure all legal memoranda includes citations to the record. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 10/9/2019. (Greene, Donna)
|
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Case assigned to Judge Ann M Donnelly. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nersten J Keith filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11926047 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Nersten J Keith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Persaud, Sharmine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
