Zhang et al v. Family Wu 1, LLC et al
| Ning Zhang, Xuesong Liu, Jiasheng Zhang, Guangxiang Qu, Lianpeng Zou, Yuzhou Wang, Yonghong Guo, Ruopeng Che and Nianchun Zhang |
| Family Wu 1, LLC, Yijing Wang, First Lamb Shabu, Peng Wu and Lao Cheng Yi Guo |
| 1:2019cv05723 |
| October 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Carol Bagley Amon |
| Robert M Levy |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jiasheng Zhang, Yuzhou Wang, Guangxiang Qu, Nianchun Zhang, Ruopeng Che, Lianpeng Zou, Yonghong Guo, Ning Zhang, Xuesong Liu. Yijing Wang served on 10/19/2019, answer due 11/11/2019. (Qi, Carter) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jiasheng Zhang, Yuzhou Wang, Guangxiang Qu, Nianchun Zhang, Ruopeng Che, Lianpeng Zou, Yonghong Guo, Ning Zhang, Xuesong Liu. Peng Wu served on 10/19/2019, answer due 11/11/2019. (Qi, Carter) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jiasheng Zhang, Yuzhou Wang, Guangxiang Qu, Nianchun Zhang, Ruopeng Che, Lianpeng Zou, Yonghong Guo, Ning Zhang, Xuesong Liu. Family Wu 1, LLC served on 10/19/2019, answer due 11/11/2019; First Lamb Shabu served on 10/19/2019, answer due 11/11/2019; Lao Cheng Yi Guo served on 10/19/2019, answer due 11/11/2019. (Qi, Carter) |
| Filing 6 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Family Wu 1, LLC, Yijing Wang, Peng Wu. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Carter Ruizhe Qi on behalf of All Plaintiffs (aty to be noticed) (Qi, Carter) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Justin Louis Heiferman on behalf of All Plaintiffs (notification declined or already on case) (Heiferman, Justin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FIRST against All Defendants filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11931887 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Jiasheng Zhang, Yuzhou Wang, Guangxiang Qu, Nianchun Zhang, Ruopeng Che, Lianpeng Zou, Yonghong Guo, Ning Zhang, Xuesong Liu. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Heiferman, Justin) |
| Case assigned to Judge Carol Bagley Amon and Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
