Fischler v. JCK Enterprises L.L.C.
| Brian Fischler |
| JCK Enterprises L.L.C. and JCK Enterprises L.L.C. doing business as Pristine Auction |
| 1:2019cv05782 |
| October 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Steven M Gold |
| LaShann DeArcy Hall |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER: An in-person initial conference will be held at 2:00 p.m. on January 16, 2020 before the undersigned in Courtroom 13-D South. Counsel for all parties must attend. Counsel for plaintiff is directed to immediately confirm this conference date and time with defendant's counsel. Adjournment requests will not be considered unless made in accordance with this Court's Individual Rules. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold on 11/27/2019. (Attachments: #1 Chamber's Individual Rules) (Gillespie, Saudia)
|
|
ORDER: Granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant JCK Enterprises L.L.C. shall answer, move or otherwise respond to the complaint by December 19, 2019. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold on 11/27/2019. (Gillespie, Saudia)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, to and including December 19, 2019. Plaintiff's counsel has no objection to this request by JCK Enterprises L.L.C.. (Queliz, Jennifer) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer Ann Queliz on behalf of JCK Enterprises L.L.C. (aty to be noticed) (Queliz, Jennifer) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brian Fischler. JCK Enterprises L.L.C. served on 10/29/2019, answer due 11/19/2019. (Lipsky, Douglas) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to JCK Enterprises L.L.C.. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Case Assigned to Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall and Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JCK Enterprises L.L.C. filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11939773 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Brian Fischler. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Lowe, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
