Century Surety Company v. CNA Insurance Companies et al
| Century Surety Company |
| Rite Aid of New York, Inc. and CNA Insurance Companies |
| 1:2019cv06120 |
| October 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Frederic Block |
| Steven M Gold |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER: An in-person initial conference will be held at 10:00 a.m. on January 24, 2020 before the undersigned in Courtroom 13-D South. Counsel for all parties must attend. Counsel for plaintiff is directed to immediately confirm this conference date and time with defendants' counsel. Adjournment requests will not be considered unless made in accordance with this Court's Individual Rules. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold on 11/26/2019. (Attachments: #1 Chamber's Individual Rules) (Gillespie, Saudia)
|
|
ORDER: Granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant CNA Insurance Companies shall answer, move or otherwise respond to the complaint by January 7, 2020. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold on 11/26/2019. (Gillespie, Saudia)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by CNA Insurance Companies. (Hertz, Marian) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Century Surety Company. CNA Insurance Companies served on 11/13/2019, answer due 12/4/2019. (Kohane, Dan) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Century Surety Company. Rite Aid of New York, Inc. served on 11/12/2019, answer due 12/3/2019. (Kohane, Dan) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to CNA Insurance Companies, Rite Aid of New York, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summon) (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Frederic Block and Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CNA Insurance Companies, Rite Aid of New York, Inc. filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11994981 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Century Surety Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - UL Summons & Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons CNA, #4 Proposed Summons Rite Aid) (Kohane, Dan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
