Washington v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A./HSBC Bank USA
| Wells Fargo Bank N.A./HSBC Bank USA |
| Rodney Randolph Washington |
| 1:2019cv06297 |
| December 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| William F Kuntz |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1334 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to File. SO Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 1/30/2020. (Tavarez, Jennifer)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Appellant's Brief by Rodney Randolph Washington. (Tavarez, Jennifer) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason Frederick Clouser on behalf of Wells Fargo Bank N.A./HSBC Bank USA (aty to be noticed) (Clouser, Jason) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Bankruptcy Record Received. Notice to all parties, in accordance with Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8010(b)(3), that the record has been received or is available electronically. Parties shall now follow briefing schedule as set forth in Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8018. Specifically, appellant must serve and file a brief within 30 days of this notice, the appellee must serve and file a brief within 30 days after service of the appellants brief, and the appellant may serve and file a reply brief within 14 days after service of the appellees brief, but a reply brief must be filed at least 7 days before scheduled argument. (Attachments: #1 Main Document Part 2, #2 Main Document Part 3, #3 Main Document Part 4, #4 Main Document Part 5, #5 Trans of Add Rec on Appeal (BK, #6 Trans of Add Rec on Appeal (BK: Notice Recipients) (Brown, Marc) |
| Filing 2 APPELLANT'S DESIGNATION OF RECORD and STATEMENTS OF ISSUES ON APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT by Rodney Randolph Washington. (Tavarez, Jennifer) |
| Filing 1 Notice of APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. Bankruptcy Court case number 1-19-44827., filed by Rodney Randolph Washington. (Attachments: #1 #39-1 Notice Recipients, #2 BK documents, #3 #42-1 Transmittal of NOA, #4 #42-2 Notice Recipients) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Notice that appeal from the Bankruptcy Court has been docketed. Parties shall file with the Bankruptcy Clerk their designations of items to be included in the record and statement of issues to be presented pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8009. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Washington v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A./HSBC Bank USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellee: Wells Fargo Bank N.A./HSBC Bank USA | |
| Represented By: | Karen Marie Sheehan |
| Represented By: | Jason Frederick Clouser |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellant: Rodney Randolph Washington | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
