Melillo v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
| Yesenia Melillo |
| Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc. and Chattem, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv06376 |
| November 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Sanket J Bulsara |
| Eric N Vitaliano |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: The motion to stay #6 is granted. All deadlines and proceedings are hereby adjourned sine die. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 12/17/2019. (Ferrara, Anthony)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher M. Strongosky on behalf of Chattem, Inc., Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC (aty to be noticed) (Strongosky, Christopher) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Chattem, Inc., Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC (Strongosky, Christopher) |
| Filing 6 Letter MOTION Request to Stay Proceedings by Chattem, Inc., Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC (Strongosky, Christopher) Modified on 12/17/2019 (Ferrara, Anthony). |
|
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Eric N. Vitaliano and Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara for all further proceedings. Judge Pamela K. Chen, Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon no longer assigned to case Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such.Ordered by Chief Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 11/21/2019. (Davis, Kimberly)
|
| Filing 5 Notice of Related Case (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Chattem, Inc., Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summon, #2 Summon) (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Pamela K. Chen and Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-12052588 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Yesenia Melillo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons) (Dsouza, Zahra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
