Rojas v. Tripoli Gourmet Corp. et al
| Adan Javier Rojas |
| Nassim Salem, Tripoli Gourmet Corp., Saleh Salem, Cobble Hill Espresso, Inc., Tripoli Gourmet Corp. doing business as Swallow Cafe and Cobble Hill Espresso, Inc. doing business as Swallow Cafe |
| 1:2019cv06765 |
| December 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Kiyo A Matsumoto |
| Cheryl L Pollak |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Russell Edwards on behalf of Cobble Hill Espresso, Inc., Nassim Salem, Saleh Salem (aty to be noticed) (Edwards, Russell) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by David S. Kasdan on behalf of Cobble Hill Espresso, Inc., Nassim Salem, Saleh Salem (aty to be noticed) (Kasdan, David) |
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Nassim Salem, Saleh Salem, Cobble Hill Espresso, Inc.. Nassim Salem waiver sent on 1/8/2020, answer due 3/9/2020; Saleh Salem waiver sent on 1/8/2020, answer due 3/9/2020; Cobble Hill Espresso, Inc. waiver sent on 1/8/2020, answer due 3/9/2020. (Edwards, Russell) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Adan Javier Rojas. Nassim Salem served on 12/19/2019, answer due 1/9/2020. (Cooper, Peter) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Adan Javier Rojas. Saleh Salem served on 12/19/2019, answer due 1/9/2020. (Cooper, Peter) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Cobble Hill Espresso, Inc.. (Galeano, Sonia) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Summons. Re #5 Amended Complaint by Adan Javier Rojas (Cooper, Peter) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Nassim Salem, Saleh Salem, Cobble Hill Espresso, Inc., filed by Adan Javier Rojas. (Cooper, Peter) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Case assigned to Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto and Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nassim Salem, Saleh Salem, Tripoli Gourmet Corp. filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-12115952 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Adan Javier Rojas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Cooper, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
