Zheng v. United States of America et al
| Yu Yan Zheng |
| Mou Chien Lim, United States of America and Jin Feng Yan |
| 1:2019cv06874 |
| December 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Allyne R Ross |
| Vera M Scanlon |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Tort Claim |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
RE-SCHEDULING ORDER: Due to a scheduling conflict, the Initial Conference set for 2/10/2020 will begin at 11:30 AM (not 12:00 PM) in Courtroom 13A South before Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. Counsel are to confirm amongst themselves that all are aware of this change. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 2/3/2020. (Quinlan, Krista)
|
|
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER: As set forth in the attached Order, an Initial Conference is scheduled for 2/10/2020 at 12:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Scanlon in Courtroom 13A South. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to confirm with Defendants' counsel that all necessary participants are aware of this conference. Counsel must complete the attached joint proposed scheduling order and file on ECF no later than 2/6/2020. Any requests for adjournment must be made in writing on notice to opposing parties, and must disclose whether all parties consent. No request for adjournment will be considered unless made at least forty-eight (48) hours before the scheduled conference unless in an emergency. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 1/23/2020. (Quinlan, Krista)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint , CROSSCLAIM against United States of America by Jin Feng Yan, Mou Chien Lim. (Camacho, Andres) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Mou Chien Lim, United States of America, Jin Feng Yan, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons.Civil Cover Sheet.. by Yu Yan Zheng (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Spivak, Ernest) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Allyne R. Ross and Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Yu Yan Zheng filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-12132980 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -yes,, filed by Yu Yan Zheng. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Spivak, Ernest) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
