Bissessar v. Radius Global Solutions LLC
Samien Bissessar |
Radius Global Solutions LLC |
1:2019cv07063 |
December 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Lois Bloom |
Pamela K Chen |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER: The Court shall hold an initial conference in pro se plaintiff's case on 2/20/2020 at 12:30 p.m. in Courtroom 11A South of the United States Courthouse. No planning conference pursuant to Rule 26(a) shall be required at this time. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, on 1/13/2020. C/mailed. (Initial Conference set for 2/20/2020 at 12:30 p.m. in Courtroom 11A South before Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by Radius Global Solutions LLC. (Easley, Aaron) |
Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Case assigned to Judge Pamela K. Chen and Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Radius Global Solutions LLC from Civil Court of the City of New York, County of Queens, case number 16369. SCQ 2019 1. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ANYEDC-12165881) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Notice of Claim, #3 Exhibit B - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal) (Easley, Aaron) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bissessar v. Radius Global Solutions LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Samien Bissessar | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Radius Global Solutions LLC | |
Represented By: | Aaron R Easley |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.