Dohrman v. Yoga Works, Inc.
Plaintiff: Yoga Works, Inc. and Julie Dohrman
Case Number: 1:2019cv07069
Filed: December 17, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Frederic Block
Referring Judge: Vera M Scanlon
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 10, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER granting joint #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer; granting #10 Motion to Adjourn Conference. Defendant's deadline to answer the Complaint or otherwise move is extended to 2/28/2020. At the request of the parties, the 2/26/2020 Initial Conference is rescheduled to 3/17/2020 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 13A South before Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. The Parties are to refer to #9 and must file the joint proposed scheduling order by 3/12/2020. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 2/10/2020. (Quinlan, Krista)
February 7, 2020 Filing 10 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #9 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer,,,, Scheduling Order,,, , Letter MOTION to Adjourn Conference by Yoga Works, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Appendix stipulation to extend Deft's time to Answer Plaintiff's Compliant and to Adjourn Conference) (Tripp, Noel)
January 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant's deadline to answer the Complaint or otherwise move is extended to 2/7/2020. SCHEDULING ORDER: As set forth in the attached Order, an Initial Conference is scheduled for 2/26/2020 at 2:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Scanlon in Courtroom 13A South. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to confirm with Defendant's counsel that all necessary participants are aware of this conference. Counsel must complete the attached joint proposed scheduling order and file on ECF no later than 2/20/2020. Any requests for adjournment must be made in writing on notice to opposing parties, and must disclose whether all parties consent. No request for adjournment will be considered unless made at least forty-eight (48) hours before the scheduled conference unless in an emergency. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 1/24/2020. (Quinlan, Krista)
January 23, 2020 Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Yoga Works, Inc.. (Tripp, Noel)
December 23, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Yoga Works, Inc.. (Sweeney, Brendan)
December 23, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant's time to answer, on consent, is extended to 1/23/2020. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 12/23/2019. (Oliner, Daniel)
December 20, 2019 Filing 6 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla)
December 20, 2019 Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
December 19, 2019 Filing 4 APPLICATION #3 for Refund of Fees Paid Electronically Ordered by Clerk of Court on 12/19/2019. (Marziliano, August)
December 18, 2019 Filing 3 Letter MOTION for Refund of Fees Paid Electronically by Yoga Works, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Appendix EDNY receipt #1, #2 Appendix EDNY receipt #2) (Tripp, Noel)
December 17, 2019 Case assigned to Judge Frederic Block and Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla)
December 17, 2019 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Yoga Works, Inc. (Tripp, Noel)
December 17, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Yoga Works, Inc. from Kings County Supreme Court, case number 523794/2019. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ANYEDC-12167212) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit) (Tripp, Noel)
December 17, 2019 CIVIL CASE FILING FEE: $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-12167185 (Tripp, Noel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dohrman v. Yoga Works, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yoga Works, Inc.
Represented By: Noel P Tripp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Julie Dohrman
Represented By: Christopher Quincy Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?