Francini v. Chase Manhattan Bank et al
| Victoria Francini |
| Chase Manhattan Bank and JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association |
| 1:2020cv00188 |
| January 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| I Leo Glasser |
| Ramon E Reyes |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr:Initial Conference Hearing held on 2/6/2020. Case called. Appearances: Glen E. Wertheimer, P.C., appeared on the behalf of Dominick W. Lavelle, Esq for the Plaintiff. Lindsay Jill Kalick, Esq., for the Defendants. Discussions held on the record. The parties' Case Management Statement #9 is approved by the Court. All discovery, including depositions of experts, shall be completed on or before 7/9/2020., Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/22/2020 at 11:30 AM in Courtroom 2E North before Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr., Telephone Conference set for 5/8/2020 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr. The parties are directed to use the toll-free number 1-888-684-8852 and access code 5496961# to participate in the scheduled telephone conference.(FTR Log #11:22:53-11:34:08.) (Vertus, Miriam) |
ORDER granting #8 request for appearance by per diem counsel. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr. on 2/4/2020. (Townsend, McCahey)
|
| Filing 9 Proposed Scheduling Order by all parties by JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association (Kalick, Lindsay) |
| Filing 8 Letter Regarding Per Diem Coverage by Victoria Francini (Lavelle, Dominick) |
|
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Conference set for 2/6/2020 at 11:15 AM in Courtroom 2E North before Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes Jr., located in the United States Eastern District of New York Courthouse, 225 Cadman Plaza East, Brooklyn, New York 11201. All counsel are required to attend, and plaintiff's counsel is directed to ensure that all counsel are aware of their obligation to appear. Any requests for adjournment must be made in writing on notice to opposing parties, and must disclose whether all parties consent. No request for adjournment will be considered unless made at least forty-eight (48) hours before the scheduled conference. Prior to the conference, the parties are to comply with the requirements of Rule 26(f) of the Fed. R. Civ. P. (See attached blank document) Case Management Statement must be completed and filed on ECF no later than 2/3/2020. Counsel with knowledge and authority must be present. Per diem counsel may not appear without prior permission of the Court. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 1/16/2020. (Vertus, Miriam)
|
|
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom no longer assigned to case Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Ordered by Chief Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 1/16/2020. (Brown, Marc)
|
| Filing 6 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Chase Manhattan Bank, JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Kalick, Lindsay) |
| Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Case Assigned to Judge I. Leo Glasser and Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Chase Manhattan Bank, JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association identifying Corporate Parent JPMorgan Chase & Co. for Chase Manhattan Bank, JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association. (Kalick, Lindsay) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Notice of Removal, by Chase Manhattan Bank, JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association (Kalick, Lindsay) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Chase Manhattan Bank, JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association from Supreme Court, County of Kings, case number 515617/2019. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ANYEDC-12237100) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-filed complaint, #2 Exhibit B- filed answer, #3 Exhibit C- demand for ad damnum, #4 Exhibit D- response to demand for ad damnum, #5 Exhibit E- Articles of Incorp) (Kalick, Lindsay) (Attachment 2 replaced on 1/10/2020) (Bowens, Priscilla). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
