Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut et al v. Tiger's Maintenance & Building, Inc.
| Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut |
| Tiger's Maintenance & Building, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv00324 |
| January 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brian M Cogan |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Letter Advising court that Deft. has been served but has not answered by Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut (Gamrat, Christopher) |
ORDER re: #8 Letter Advising court. This letter should have been designated as a motion on ECF since it seeks relief from the Court. Do not refile. In any event, the request is granted in part. The 3/24/2020 Initial Status Conference is adjourned sine die, provided that plaintiff shall request that the Clerk of Court enter defendant's default by 3/26/2020. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 3/20/2020. (Weisberg, Peggy)
|
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT/AFFIRMATION Affidavit of Service upon Tiger's Maintenance & Building Inc. by Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut (Gamrat, Christopher) |
|
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Status Conference is set for 3/24/2020 at 5:15 PM in Chambers 704S. SEE ATTACHED MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONFERENCE. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 2/4/2020. (Clarke, Melonie)
|
| Filing 5 CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. Instructions and Arbitration Procedure sent to Counsel and/or Pro se Litigants. This case has been designated to participate in the Court Annexed Arbitration Program pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.7(d) wherein money damages only are being sought in an amount not in excess of $150,000.00 exclusive of interest and costs. Damages are presumed not to be in excess of the arbitration limit unless a certification is filed in accordance with Local Civil Rule 83.7(d) (3) After an Answer is filed, an Arbitration Hearing will be scheduled. The hearing will be scheduled to occur approximately 120 days after filing of the Answer. Counsel have 120 days to complete discovery unless the magistrate judge orders a shorter or longer period for discovery If you have questions please contact ADR Coordinator Rita Credle: Email: rita_credle@nyed.uscourtsd.gov (Credle, Rita) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT/AFFIRMATION Affirmation in Opposition by Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Gamrat, Christopher) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Tiger's Maintenance & Building, Inc.. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
|
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: #1 . The complaint fails to properly allege plaintiff's citizenship. See 28 U.S.C. 1332(c). Plaintiff shall therefore show cause by 1/29/2020 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 1/22/2020. (Clarke, Melonie)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-12274225 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -yes,, filed by Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Gamrat, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut et al v. Tiger's Maintenance & Building, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Tiger's Maintenance & Building, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Gerard Gamrat |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
