Cooper-Nolasco et al v. Royal Waste Services, Inc. et al
Keiro J Cooper-Nolasco |
Chris Adams, Royal Waste Recycling Services, Inc., Peter L. Reali, Royal Waste Services, Inc., Michael Reali, II and Paul Reali |
1:2020cv00640 |
February 5, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Kiyo A Matsumoto |
Ramon E Reyes |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Keiro J Cooper-Nolasco. Chris Adams waiver sent on 3/6/2020, answer due 5/5/2020; Michael Reali, II waiver sent on 3/6/2020, answer due 5/5/2020; Paul Reali waiver sent on 3/6/2020, answer due 5/5/2020; Peter L. Reali waiver sent on 3/6/2020, answer due 5/5/2020; Royal Waste Recycling Services, Inc. waiver sent on 3/6/2020, answer due 5/5/2020; Royal Waste Services, Inc. waiver sent on 3/6/2020, answer due 5/5/2020. (Troy, John) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Chris Adams, Michael Reali, II, Paul Reali, Peter L. Reali, Royal Waste Recycling Services, Inc., Royal Waste Services, Inc.. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 6 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Aaron Schweitzer on behalf of Keiro J Cooper-Nolasco (aty to be noticed) (Schweitzer, Aaron) |
Filing 3 CONSENT to become party in a collective action. by Keiro J Cooper-Nolasco (Troy, John) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons.Civil Cover Sheet.. by Keiro J Cooper-Nolasco (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons) (Troy, John) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Chris Adams, Paul Reali, Peter L. Reali, Royal Waste Recycling Services, Inc., Royal Waste Services, Inc., Michael Reali, II filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-12343415 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Keiro J Cooper-Nolasco. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 01 Notice to Enforce Shareholder Liability for Services Rendered, #2 Exhibit 02 Notice to Inspect Share Records, #3 Exhibit 03 Document Preservation Demand, #4 Exhibit 04 Notice of Lien and Assignment, #5 Exhibit 05 Notice that Retaliation is Illegal under the FLSA and NYLL, #6 Exhibit 06 Notice Settlement Under the Table is Prohibited) (Troy, John) |
Case Assigned to Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto and Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.