Demas v. Block Institute
| Johanne C. Demas |
| Block Institute |
| 1:2020cv00692 |
| February 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Lois Bloom |
| Ann M Donnelly |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. The plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The Court grants the plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days of this order. If the plaintiff decides to file an amended complaint, it should be titled "AMENDED COMPLAINT" and bear the same docket number as this order, 1:20-CV-00692-AMD-LB. An amended complaint will replace the original complaint. That is, the amended complaint must stand on its own without reference to the original complaint. The plaintiff must set forth facts to support her claims. For example, for her Title VII claim, the plaintiff must provide details about how her termination was racially motived. For her ADA claim, she must allege facts about her disability and the defendant's knowledge of and response to that disability. All proceedings are stayed for thirty days or until further order of the Court. If the plaintiff does not file an amended complaint within the time allowed or show good cause why she cannot comply, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment and close case. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 3/2/2020. (Greene, Donna)
|
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Johanne C. Demas. (Davis, Kimberly) . |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Block Institute, filed by Johanne C. Demas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Davis, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Demas v. Block Institute | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Johanne C. Demas | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Block Institute | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
