Mitchell v. Urban Strategies, Inc., et al
Riley, Mitchell |
Urban Strategies, Inc.,, Local 108, Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, UFCW, AFL-CIO, CLC,, Gweneth Munroe, Urban Strategies Management Corp., and US Brownsville III Housing Development Fund Corporation, |
1:2020cv00893 |
February 19, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Ann M Donnelly |
Roanne L Mann |
Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
29 U.S.C. ยง 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ELECTRONIC ORDER re #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer: Application granted, on consent. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann on 4/9/2020. (Vallens, Adrian) |
Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, filed by plaintiff's counsel as courtesy on behalf of counsel for Defendant LOCAL 108, RETAIL, WHOLESALE AND DEPARTMENT STORE UNION by Riley, Mitchell. (Eke-Nweke, Vincent) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Riley, Mitchell. Local 108, Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, UFCW, AFL-CIO, CLC, served on 3/19/2020, answer due 4/9/2020. (Eke-Nweke, Vincent) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Riley, Mitchell. US Brownsville III Housing Development Fund Corporation, served on 2/21/2020, answer due 3/13/2020. (Eke-Nweke, Vincent) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Riley, Mitchell. Gweneth Munroe served on 2/21/2020, answer due 3/13/2020. (Eke-Nweke, Vincent) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Riley, Mitchell. Urban Strategies Management Corp., served on 2/21/2020, answer due 3/13/2020. (Eke-Nweke, Vincent) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Riley, Mitchell. Urban Strategies, Inc., served on 2/21/2020, answer due 3/13/2020. (Eke-Nweke, Vincent) |
Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Case Assigned to Judge Ann M Donnelly and Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT of Plaintiff, Riley Mitchell, against All Defendants filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-12414224 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Riley, Mitchell. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Eke-Nweke, Vincent) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.