Settles v. The Long Island Railroad Company
Thomas J. Settles |
The Long Island Railroad Company |
1:2020cv01148 |
March 3, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Kiyo A Matsumoto |
James Orenstein |
Federal Employer's Liability |
45 U.S.C. ยง 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER: Deadline for all Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures: April 24, 2020. First request for production of documents and first request for interrogatories due by: May 11, 2020. Deadline for joinder of additional parties and amendment of pleadings: May 25, 2020. Fact discovery to be completed by: August 31, 2020. Plaintiff's expert disclosures due by: August 24, 2020. Defendant's expert disclosures due by: September 24, 2020. All discovery, including all expert disclosures under Rule 26(a)(2), if any, to be completed by: September 24, 2020. Pretrial Conference (ex parte statements of settlement position due via email two business days in advance): October 5, 2020, at 10:30 a.m. Dispositive motion process started by: October 19, 2020. Joint pretrial order due by: November 24, 2020. SEE ATTACHED ORDER. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James Orenstein on 4/20/2020. (Orenstein, James) |
Filing 8 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge James Orenstein: Initial Conference Hearing held on 4/20/2020. Scheduling: The next pretrial conference will be held on October 5, 2020, at 10:30 a.m. Summary: I will enter a separate case management and scheduling order that reflects, with minor modifications, the deadlines set forth in the parties' joint discovery plan. (Orenstein, James) |
Filing 7 Proposed Scheduling Order by Thomas J. Settles (Chiatto, Elizabeth) |
Filing 6 SCHEDULING ORDER: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(a), I order the parties to attend an initial discovery planning conference on April 20, 2020, at 10:30 a.m. that will take place telephonically. The call-in information for the telephone conference is 1-877-336-1839 and the access code is 391-4302. I respectfully direct all counsel to call in to the telephone conference five minutes before the conference begins. If any party has any difficulty accessing the telephone conference, please contact chambers at Orenstein_Chambers@nyed.uscourts.gov. No later than April 16, 2020, the parties must submit, by means of electronic filing on the court's ECF (Electronic Case Filing) system, a joint proposed discovery plan. Each party's counsel must be personally prepared to discuss all factual and legal issues in the case, including the possibility of settlement; otherwise, the client must attend as well. SEE ATTACHED ORDER. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James Orenstein on 4/1/2020. (Almonte, Kelly) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by The Long Island Railroad Company. (Bonventre, John) |
Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to The Long Island Railroad Company. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Long Island Railroad Company Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -no,, filed by Thomas J. Settles. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
FILING FEE: $ 400.00, receipt number ANYEDC-12476900 (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Case Assigned to Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto and Magistrate Judge James Orenstein. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Settles v. The Long Island Railroad Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Thomas J. Settles | |
Represented By: | Philip Patrick Vogt |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: The Long Island Railroad Company | |
Represented By: | John A. Bonventre |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.