Huger v. Bell
Kevin Huger |
E. Bell |
1:2020cv01196 |
February 28, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Lois Bloom |
Kiyo A Matsumoto |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by E. Bell (Attachments: #1 Exhibit D (State's Appellate Division Brief on direct appea), #2 Exhibit E (defendant's reply Appellate Division brief on direct appeal), #3 Exhibit F (defendant's main 440 motion papers), #4 Exhibit G (State's main answer to 440 motion), #5 Exhibit H (defendant's reply to State's main answer to 440 motion), #6 Exhibit I (State's supplemental answer, dated Mar. 10, 2017 to 440 motion), #7 Exhibit J (defendant's reply, dated Mar. 28, 2017, to supplemental answer), #8 Exhibit K (State's memorandum of law, dated Apr. 3, 2017, in response to defendant's reply to State's supplemental answer), #9 Exhibit L (440 court's decision and order granting 440 motion), #10 Exhibit M (State's motion to reargue), #11 Exhibit N (defendant's response to State's motion to reargue), #12 Exhibit O (440 court's decision and order granting reargument and denying defendant's 440 motion), #13 Exhibit P (defendant's main Appellate Division brief regarding 440 motion), #14 Exhibit Q (State's Appellate Division brief regarding 440 motion), #15 Exhibit R (defendant's reply Appellate Division brief regarding 440 motion)) (Lieberman, Seth) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by E. Bell (Lieberman, Seth) |
Filing 11 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by E. Bell (Lieberman, Seth) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by E. Bell (Lieberman, Seth) |
Filing 9 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by E. Bell (Lieberman, Seth) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by E. Bell (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B, part I (trial transcript, pages 1 to 356)) (Lieberman, Seth) |
Filing 7 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by E. Bell (Lieberman, Seth) |
Filing 6 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge (Un-Signed) by Kevin Huger. (Herrera, Isaiah) |
Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT/AFFIRMATION Re Order to Show Cause sent to petitioner by E. Bell (Lieberman, Seth) |
Filing 4 SCHEDULING ORDER, Respondent is to file a complete and entire answer or other pleading in response to the petition within sixty (60) days of the date of this order. Respondent shall address in the answer whether petitioner has exhausted state remedies. That, with the answer, respondent electronically file the State Court Record, with no individual attachment to the entry exceeding five megabytes, and supply a hard copy of the State Court Record to Chambers, which shall be clearly marked "Courtesy Copy, original filed in ECF, docket number ___." Petitioner shall file any reply to respondent's answer within thirty (30) days of the filing of the answer, and it is further ORDERED, that petitioner is granted leave to proceed without being required to prepay fees or costs, or give security therefor. Respondent shall serve a copy of this order upon petitioner, and file proof of service with the Clerk of the Court, within ten (10) days of the date of this order. (See Order for all further detail) So Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 3/10/2020. (c/m via electronic service upon Kings County DA and NY State Attorney General) (Lee, Tiffeny) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kevin Huger. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus , filed by Kevin Huger. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Huger v. Bell | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: E. Bell | |
Represented By: | KINGS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE - GENERIC |
Represented By: | NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE - GENERIC |
Represented By: | Seth M. Lieberman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Kevin Huger | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.