O'Reilly v. General Motors LLC et al
| James O'Reilly |
| General Motors Investment Management Corporation, General Motors Treasury Center LLC, General Motors LLC, General Motors Holding Corporation, General Motors Overseas Distribution LLc, ACDELCO and Brooklyn AC-Delco, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv01238 |
| March 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Sanket J Bulsara |
| Eric N Vitaliano |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Request for Pre-Motion Conference In Lieu of Motion to Dismiss filed by James O'Reilly. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Warranty) (Kubick, Richard) |
| Filing 6 Letter response to plaintiff's request to file remand motion by General Motors LLC (Kramer, Steven) |
ORDER: The Court construes both #4 and #5 as requests, by the respective parties, for a pre-motion conference. As such, the parties are ordered to respond to the other party's letter motion no later than March 27, 2020. The parties are reminded that in future, all requests for action from the Court should be styled as motions, and further, to comply with all of the individual rules including making PDF documents text readable. Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 3/16/2020. (Craft, Rachel)
|
| Filing 5 Letter Requesting Permission to make motion by James O'Reilly (Attachments: #1 Exhibit NYS Dept. of State Entity Information, #2 Exhibit Product Warranty Information) (Kubick, Richard) |
| Filing 4 Letter Rule III.A Motion for a Pre Motion Conference by General Motors Holding Corporation, General Motors Investment Management Corporation, General Motors LLC, General Motors Overseas Distribution LLc, General Motors Treasury Center LLC (Kramer, Steven) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Eric N. Vitaliano and Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by General Motors LLC from Supreme Court of The State of New York Queens County, case number 701667/2020. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice of Filing, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C) (Davis, Kimberly) |
| FILING FEE: $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-1249926 (Davis, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
