Ortiz v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff: Henry Ortiz
Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2020cv01248
Filed: March 6, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Raymond J Dearie
Referring Judge: Peggy Kuo
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 1, 2020 Filing 7 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Joint status report and request for extension of time to file stipulation of dismissal by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Tobitsch, Kerianne)
May 1, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File. The parties are directed to file their stipulation of dismissal or provide a further status update by May 29, 2020. So Ordered by Judge Raymond J. Dearie on 5/1/2020. (Bakst, Laura)
April 2, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Settlement by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (Tobitsch, Kerianne)
April 2, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER re #6 Notice of Settlement filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. In light of the notice of settlement, upcoming deadlines in this matter, including for filing the Answer, are adjourned sine die. The parties are directed to file a stipulation of dismissal or status report on or before 5/1/2020. So Ordered by Judge Raymond J. Dearie on 4/2/2020. (Bakst, Laura)
March 13, 2020 Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Tobitsch, Kerianne)
March 13, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The deadline to answer, or otherwise respond, is extended to April 13, 2020. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 3/13/2020. (O'Neil-Berven, Ryan)
March 10, 2020 Filing 4 CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. This case has been designated to participate in the Court Annexed Arbitration Program pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.7(d). The Rule requires the Clerk of Court to designate and process for compulsory arbitration "all civil cases (excluding social security cases, tax matters, prisoners' civil rights cases, and any action based on an alleged violation of a right secured by the Constitution of the United States or if jurisdiction is based in whole or in part on Title 28 U.S.C. sec. 1343) wherein money damages only are being sought in an amount not in excess of $150,000.00 exclusive of interest and costs." Damages are presumed not to be in excess of the arbitration limit unless a certification is filed in accordance with Local Civil Rule 83.7(d) (3). An Arbitration Hearing will be scheduled after an Answer is filed. The hearing will occur approximately 120 days after filing of the Answer. (Credle, Rita)
March 9, 2020 Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla)
March 9, 2020 Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
March 6, 2020 Case Assigned to Judge Raymond J. Dearie and Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla)
March 6, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. from Queens County Civil Court, case number CV-002930-20. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ANYEDC-12501813) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A) (Tobitsch, Kerianne)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ortiz v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Henry Ortiz
Represented By: Edward B. Geller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Represented By: Kerianne Tobitsch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?