Black v. Rite Aid of New York, Inc. et al
Kailyn Black |
Rite Aid of New York, Inc. and Rite Aid Corporation |
1:2020cv01696 |
April 3, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Ann M Donnelly |
Vera M Scanlon |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
SCHEDULING ORDER: As discussed during the 5/13/2020 conference (see attached order for additional detail and deadlines), fact discovery closes on 9/30/2020. Initial expert reports due by 10/31/2020. All discovery must be completed by 2/26/2021. On or before 2/26/2021, the Parties will file a joint status report letter confirming that discovery is complete. On or before 3/31/2021, the Parties will initiate any dispositive motions in accordance with the Individual Rules of the District Judge. On or before 4/30/2021, the Parties will file their joint Proposed Pretrial Order. A Telephone Conference is set for 9/16/2020 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. On or before 9/10/2020, the Parties will file a joint status report letter, of no more than three pages, identifying any outstanding discovery disputes. The Parties are to call 877-336-1829 and type in the access code 3581283 for the AT&T conference bridge. Should the Parties experience delays or difficulty accessing the conference bridge due to a high volume of calls, please dial again. In case of an emergency or should the Parties need to apprise the Court of any confidential developments requiring an adjournment of the telephone conference, the Parties may contact the Court via email at Scanlon_Chambers@nyed.uscourts.gov with 3 proposed alternative dates. No ex parte communications. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 5/13/2020. (Quinlan, Krista) |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon:Telephone Conference held on 5/13/2020. J. Sean Connelly appearing for Plaintiff. Annie Cha appearing for Defendants. See separate docket entry for Order issuing from this proceeding. (FTR Log #2:33-2:47.) (Quinlan, Krista) |
Filing 8 Proposed Scheduling Order by Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid of New York, Inc. (Cha, Annie) |
Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER: As set forth in the attached Order, a Telephonic Initial Conference is scheduled for 5/13/2020 at 2:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Scanlon. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to confirm with Defendants' counsel that all necessary participants are aware of this conference. Counsel must complete the attached joint proposed scheduling order and file on ECF no later than 5/7/2020. Any requests for adjournment must be made in writing on notice to opposing parties, and must disclose whether all parties consent. No request for adjournment will be considered unless made at least forty-eight (48) hours before the scheduled conference. The Parties are to call 877-336-1829 and type in the access code 3581283 for the AT&T conference bridge. Should the Parties experience delays or difficulty accessing the conference bridge due to a high volume of calls, please dial again. In case of an emergency or should the Parties need to apprise the Court of any confidential developments requiring an adjournment of the telephone conference, the Parties may contact the Court via email at Scanlon_Chambers@nyed.uscourts.gov with 3 proposed alternative dates. No ex parte communications. Telephone Conference set for before Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 4/7/2020. (Quinlan, Krista) |
Filing 6 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Case Assigned to Judge Ann M Donnelly and Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT/AFFIRMATION re #2 Jury Demand, #3 Corporate Disclosure Statement, #1 Notice of Removal, Affidavit of Service by Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid of New York, Inc. (Cha, Annie) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid of New York, Inc. (Cha, Annie) |
Filing 2 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid of New York, Inc. (Cha, Annie) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants Rite Aid of New York, Inc. and Rite Aid Corporation from Supreme Court, Kings, case number 523545/2019. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ANYEDC-12633267) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Cha, Annie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.