Hohenberger v. Long Island Rail Road Company
| James Hohenberger |
| Long Island Rail Road Company |
| 1:2020cv02164 |
| May 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Sanket J Bulsara |
| Brian M Cogan |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Proposed Scheduling Order of the Parties by James Hohenberger (Lauriello, Valerie) |
Filing 11
An initial/telephone conference will be held at 11:00 AM on 7/10/2020 before Magistrate Judge Bulsara. The parties are directed to call the toll-free number 877-336-1274. The access code is 6534420. The parties shall dial in five (5) minutes before the 11:00 AM conference.Counsel are directed to complete the attached Discovery Plan Worksheet and electronically file same with the Court no later than two days before 7/10/2020. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the discovery worksheet, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case.So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 6/11/2020. (Manson, Eddie)
|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Long Island Rail Road Company. (Yodice, Christopher) |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Long Island Rail Road Company identifying Corporate Parent Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Other Affiliate MTA New York City Transit, Other Affiliate MTA Metro-North Commuter Railroad, Other Affiliate MTA Staten Island Railway, Other Affiliate MTA Capital Construction, Other Affiliate MTA Bus Company, Other Affiliate MTA Bridges and Tunnels for Long Island Rail Road Company. (Yodice, Christopher) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara for all further proceedings. Judge Brian M. Cogan no longer assigned to case Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Guzzi, Roseann) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Long Island Rail Road Company. (Yodice, Christopher) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Long Island Rail Road Company. Long Island Rail Road Company waiver sent on 5/26/2020, answer due 7/27/2020. (Yodice, Christopher) |
|
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Status Conference is set for 6/25/2020 at 10:30 am in Chambers 704S. SEE ATTACHED MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONFERENCE. In addition, plaintiff is directed to serve on defendant a complete set of medical releases and authorizations together with the summons and complaint. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 5/14/2020. (Weisberg, Peggy)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Long Island Rail Road Company. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Long Island Rail Road Company filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-12791601 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -yes,, filed by James Hohenberger. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Lauriello, Valerie) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hohenberger v. Long Island Rail Road Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James Hohenberger | |
| Represented By: | Valerie J. Lauriello |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Long Island Rail Road Company | |
| Represented By: | Christopher P. Yodice |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
