Brathwaite v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Mellisa Jwahiz Brathwaite
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2020cv02674
Filed: June 11, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Rachel P Kovner
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 25, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Dennis Canning on behalf of Mellisa Jwahiz Brathwaite (aty to be noticed) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service) (Canning, Dennis)
June 19, 2020 Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Commissioner of Social Security. (Courtesy copies of the Summons, the Court's 6/18/2020 Order and Plaintiff's Complaint sent to the United States Attorney General; United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York; and General Counsel at SSA.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
June 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SCHEDULING ORDER: Plaintiff filed the complaint on June 11, 2020. The parties are directed to adhere to the following procedure, which the Eastern District of New York Board of Judges has adopted for expediting the disposition of Social Security cases (See ATTACHED Order for further details). Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 6/18/2020. (Chan, Tsz)
June 18, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 6/18/2020. (Chan, Tsz)
June 17, 2020 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly)
June 11, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Mellisa Jwahiz Brathwaite. (Davis, Kimberly)
June 11, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Mellisa Jwahiz Brathwaite. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Davis, Kimberly)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brathwaite v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION - GENERIC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mellisa Jwahiz Brathwaite
Represented By: Dennis Canning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?