Construction Council 175, Utility Workers of America, AFL-CIO, v. New York Paving, Inc.
| Construction Council 175, Utility Workers of America, AFL-CIO, |
| New York Paving, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv02732 |
| June 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Kiyo A Matsumoto |
| James Orenstein |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant New York Paving, Inc.'s deadline to answer is extended, nunc pro tunc, to August 31, 2020. The court adopts the following revised schedule: (1) defendant will answer, oppose or otherwise respond to the Petition, and file the Petition to Vacate on or before August 31, 2020; (2) plaintiff will file its reply and opposition to the Petition to Vacate on or before September 21, 2020; and (3) defendant will file its reply to Plaintiff's opposition on or before October 1, 2020. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 8/13/2020. (Brasky, Michael)
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Petition re: Arbitration Award, by New York Paving, Inc.. (Getiashvili, Ana)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Appearance by Ana Getiashvili on behalf of New York Paving, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Getiashvili, Ana)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Appearance by Richard Michael Howard on behalf of New York Paving, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Howard, Richard)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Appearance by Larry R. Martinez on behalf of New York Paving, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Martinez, Larry)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan D. Farrell on behalf of New York Paving, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Farrell, Jonathan)
|
|
Filing 8
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Construction Council 175, Utility Workers of America, AFL-CIO,. New York Paving, Inc. served on 6/29/2020, answer due 7/20/2020. (Rocco, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 7
Summons Issued as to New York Paving, Inc.. (Davis, Kimberly)
|
|
Filing 6
This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly)
|
|
Filing 5
In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly)
|
|
Filing 4
Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Petition re: Arbitration Award, by Construction Council 175, Utility Workers of America, AFL-CIO, (Rocco, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 3
Proposed Summons. Re #1 Petition re: Arbitration Award, by Construction Council 175, Utility Workers of America, AFL-CIO, (Rocco, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM in Support re #1 Petition re: Arbitration Award, filed by Construction Council 175, Utility Workers of America, AFL-CIO,. (Rocco, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION re: Arbitration Award to confirm Liability and Relief Arbitration Awards Dated April 29, 2019 and June 4, 2020, respectively, filed by Construction Council 175, Utility Workers of America, AFL-CIO,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A; Liability Award, #2 Exhibit B; Relief Award, #3 Exhibit C; Collective Bargaining Agreement, #4 Exhibit D; Initial Grievance, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (Rocco, Matthew)
|
|
CIVIL CASE FILING FEE: $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-12951612 (Rocco, Matthew)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto and Magistrate Judge James Orenstein. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Construction Council 175, Utility Workers of America, AFL-CIO, v. New York Paving, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Construction Council 175, Utility Workers of America, AFL-CIO, | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Phillip Rocco |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: New York Paving, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan D. Farrell |
| Represented By: | Ana Getiashvili |
| Represented By: | Larry R. Martinez |
| Represented By: | Richard Michael Howard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
