Singh et al v. All Empire Building Contractors Inc. et al
| Dharmender Singh and Ranjit Singh |
| Harjinder Singh, All Empire Building Contractors Inc. and Tony Singh |
| 1:2020cv02736 |
| June 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CONSENT to become party in a collective action. by Dharmender Singh (Troy, John) |
| Filing 3 CONSENT to become party in a collective action. by Ranjit Singh (Troy, John) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons.Civil Cover Sheet.. by Dharmender Singh, Ranjit Singh (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons) (Troy, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Empire Building Contractors Inc., Harjinder Singh filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-12952113 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Ranjit Singh, Dharmender Singh. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 01 Notice to Enforce Shareholder Liability for Services Rendered, #2 Exhibit 02 Notice to Inspect Share Records, #3 Exhibit 03 Document Preservation Demand, #4 Exhibit 04 Notice of Lien and Assignment, #5 Exhibit 05 Notice that Retaliation is Illegal under the FLSA and NYLL, #6 Exhibit 06 Notice Settlement Under the Table is Prohibited) (Troy, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
