Jeffery et al v. The City of New York et al
| Thaddeus Blake, Lamel Jeffery and Chayse Pena |
| P.O.s John Doe #1-50, The City of New York, Andrew Cuomo and Bill De Blasio |
| 1:2020cv02843 |
| June 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Nicholas G Garaufis |
| Robert M Levy |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER re: #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer The Governors time to answer has indeed already been extended to 10/15/20 by an order that applied to All Defendants, a term that most certainly included the Governor, who is a defendant. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy on 8/4/2020. (Levy, Robert)
|
|
Filing 9
Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, and/or To Confirm Prior Order Setting Briefing Schedule by Andrew Cuomo. (Oloughlin, D.)
|
|
Filing 8
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lamel Jeffery, Chayse Pena, Thaddeus Blake. Bill De Blasio served on 7/16/2020, answer due 10/15/2020. (Fuchs, Ilyssa)
|
|
Filing 7
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lamel Jeffery, Chayse Pena, Thaddeus Blake. Andrew Cuomo served on 7/15/2020, answer due 10/15/2020. (Fuchs, Ilyssa)
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lamel Jeffery, Chayse Pena, Thaddeus Blake. The City of New York served on 6/26/2020, answer due 10/15/2020. (Fuchs, Ilyssa)
|
|
ORDER granting #5 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer All Defendants. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy on 7/16/2020. (Levy, Robert)
|
|
Filing 5
First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Bill De Blasio, The City of New York. (Murray, Edward)
|
|
Filing 4
This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla)
|
|
Filing 3
In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to Andrew Cuomo, Bill De Blasio, The City of New York. (Bowens, Priscilla)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Andrew Cuomo, Bill De Blasio, P.O.s John Doe #1-50, The City of New York filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-12984116 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Lamel Jeffery, Chayse Pena, Thaddeus Blake. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Fuchs, Ilyssa)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis and Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
