Lin et al v. Wolf et al
Plaintiff: Dai Hua Lin and Ze Shi Zhu
Defendant: Donald Neufeld, Chad F. Wolf and Mark Koumans
Case Number: 1:2020cv03212
Filed: July 17, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Nicholas G Garaufis
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 14, 2020 Filing 13 STIPULATION of Dismissal without prejudice, respectfully submitted for the Court's endorsement by Mark Koumans, Donald Neufeld, Chad F. Wolf (Mailloux, Matthew)
August 10, 2020 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Mailloux on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Mailloux, Matthew)
July 24, 2020 Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dai Hua Lin, Ze Shi Zhu. Chad F. Wolf served on 7/22/2020, answer due 9/21/2020. (Lee, Corey)
July 24, 2020 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dai Hua Lin, Ze Shi Zhu. Donald Neufeld served on 7/22/2020, answer due 9/21/2020. (Lee, Corey)
July 24, 2020 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dai Hua Lin, Ze Shi Zhu. Mark Koumans served on 7/22/2020, answer due 9/21/2020. (Lee, Corey)
July 23, 2020 Incorrect Entry Information re #5 - #8 . The Affidavit of Service event is not to be used for the filing of proof of service as to a complaint. Counsel should refile their service documents using the proper SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED AS TO USA event. (Lee, Tiffeny)
July 22, 2020 Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Chad Wolf on 07/22/2020, filed by Dai Hua Lin, Ze Shi Zhu. (Lee, Corey)
July 22, 2020 Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Donald Neufeld on 07/22/2020, filed by Dai Hua Lin, Ze Shi Zhu. (Lee, Corey)
July 22, 2020 Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Mark Koumans on 7/22/2020, filed by Dai Hua Lin, Ze Shi Zhu. (Lee, Corey)
July 22, 2020 Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on US Attorney Seth D. DuCharme on 7/22/2020, filed by Dai Hua Lin, Ze Shi Zhu. (Lee, Corey)
July 17, 2020 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Mark Koumans, Donald Neufeld, Chad F. Wolf, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Davis, Kimberly)
July 17, 2020 Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly)
July 17, 2020 Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly)
July 17, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-13079419 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Dai Hua Lin, Ze Shi Zhu. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Lee, Corey)
July 17, 2020 Case Assigned to Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lin et al v. Wolf et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Donald Neufeld
Represented By: Matthew Mailloux
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chad F. Wolf
Represented By: Matthew Mailloux
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Koumans
Represented By: Matthew Mailloux
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dai Hua Lin
Represented By: Corey T Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ze Shi Zhu
Represented By: Corey T Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?