Teitelbaum v. I.C. System, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Boruch Teitelbaum
Defendant: John Does 1-25 and I.C. System, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2020cv03272
Filed: July 21, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Pamela K Chen
Referring Judge: James Orenstein
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 18, 2020 Filing 11 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney by I.C. System, Inc.(Quinn, Lori) Modified on 9/18/2020 to reflect that is not a Notice, but rather a Motion to Withdraw as Attorney (Almonte, Kelly).
September 18, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Peter G. Siachos on behalf of I.C. System, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Siachos, Peter)
September 18, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER re #11 Notice(Other) -- The motion is granted; attorney Lori Jean Quinn is terminated. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James Orenstein on 9/18/2020. (Oliner, Daniel)
September 14, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER: Contrary to the Court's Individual Rules, Defendant I.C. System, Inc. filed its #7 Motion to Dismiss without first requesting a pre-motion conference. Accordingly, Defendant I.C. System shall file a pre-motion conference request that complies with the Court's Individual Rules by September 21, 2020, to which Plaintiff has until September 28, 2020 to respond. The Court will thereafter determine whether a pre-motion conference is necessary before any briefing of a motion to dismiss. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 9/14/2020. (Marks, Miriam)
September 11, 2020 Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by I.C. System, Inc. (Quinn, Lori)
September 11, 2020 Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Support re #7 Notice of MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by I.C. System, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Quinn, Lori)
September 11, 2020 Filing 7 Notice of MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by I.C. System, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service Notice of Motion to Dismiss FRCP 12(b)(6)) (Quinn, Lori)
August 19, 2020 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Boruch Teitelbaum. I.C. System, Inc. served on 7/23/2020, answer due 9/11/2020. (Force, David)
August 11, 2020 Filing 5 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #4 Summons Issued, #1 Complaint, with Consent of Plaintiff extending time to Answer, move or otherwise plead for thirty days up to an inclusive of September 11, 2020 by I.C. System, Inc.. (Quinn, Lori)
August 11, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer -- The motion is granted on consent; the defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint by September 11, 2020. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James Orenstein on 8/11/2020. (Gutmann, Joseph)
July 22, 2020 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to I.C. System, Inc.. (Davis, Kimberly)
July 22, 2020 Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly)
July 22, 2020 Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly)
July 22, 2020 Case Assigned to Judge Pamela K. Chen and Magistrate Judge James Orenstein. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly)
July 21, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against I.C. System, Inc., John Does 1-25 filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-13095957 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -no,, filed by Boruch Teitelbaum. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit a, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons) (Force, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Teitelbaum v. I.C. System, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-25
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: I.C. System, Inc.
Represented By: Lori Jean Quinn
Represented By: Peter G. Siachos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Boruch Teitelbaum
Represented By: David Paul Force
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?