Antonov v. Associated Credit Services, Inc.
Fedor Antonov |
Associated Credit Services, Inc. |
1:2020cv03325 |
July 23, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Margo K Brodie |
Cheryl L Pollak |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Settlement as to Plaintiff and Defendant Associated Credit Services, Inc. by Fedor Antonov (Horowitz, Uri) |
ELECTRONIC ORDER re #6 : Stipulation of discontinuance to be filed within 60 days - 11/11/2020. So Ordered by Chief Magistrate Cheryl L. Pollak on 9/11/2020. (Caggiano, Diana) |
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Fedor Antonov. Associated Credit Services, Inc. waiver sent on 7/27/2020, answer due 9/25/2020. (Horowitz, Uri) |
Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Associated Credit Services, Inc.. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Case Assigned to Judge Margo K. Brodie and Chief Magistrate Cheryl L. Pollak. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Associated Credit Services, Inc. filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-13107853 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Fedor Antonov. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons Associated Credit Services, Inc.) (Horowitz, Uri) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Antonov v. Associated Credit Services, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Associated Credit Services, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Fedor Antonov | |
Represented By: | Uri Horowitz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.