Giuliano v. Omni Hybrid Holdings, LLC. et al
Plaintiff: Amy Thomas Giuliano
Defendant: Moses Shyne Barrow and Omni Hybrid Holdings, LLC.
Case Number: 1:2020cv03334
Filed: July 24, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Robert M Levy
Referring Judge: Roslynn R Mauskopf
Nature of Suit: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 17, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, but denying motion for a pre-motion conference. A pre-motion conference is unnecessary in this case. Defendants shall serve their motion to dismiss on plaintiff on or before October 2, 2020, and plaintiff shall serve a response to that motion on defendants on or before October 19, 2020. Defendants shall have until October 30, 2020, in which to serve a reply, if any; file the fully briefed motion; and mail courtesy copies of all motion papers to chambers. Defendants' time to answer the complaint is extended to 14 days after the date of the order deciding the motion. Ordered by Chief Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 9/17/2020. Caspari, Alexander)
September 16, 2020 Filing 13 REPLY to Response to Motion re #10 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, and for conference for leave to file dismissal motion and objecting to plaintiff's request filed by Moses Shyne Barrow, Omni Hybrid Holdings, LLC.. (Michelen, Oscar)
September 16, 2020 Filing 12 RESPONSE to Motion re #10 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, and for conference for leave to file dismissal motion filed by Amy Thomas Giuliano. (Benjamin, Jeffrey)
August 4, 2020 Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Amy Thomas Giuliano. Omni Hybrid Holdings, LLC. served on 7/28/2020, answer due 8/18/2020. (Benjamin, Jeffrey)
July 28, 2020 Filing 10 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, and for conference for leave to file dismissal motion by Moses Shyne Barrow, Omni Hybrid Holdings, LLC.. (Michelen, Oscar)
July 28, 2020 Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Omni Hybrid Holdings, LLC. (Michelen, Oscar)
July 28, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Oscar Michelen on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Michelen, Oscar)
July 24, 2020 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Moses Shyne Barrow, Omni Hybrid Holdings, LLC.. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (Davis, Kimberly)
July 24, 2020 Filing 6 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly)
July 24, 2020 Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly)
July 24, 2020 Filing 4 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint, by Amy Thomas Giuliano (Benjamin, Jeffrey)
July 24, 2020 Filing 3 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Amy Thomas Giuliano (Benjamin, Jeffrey)
July 24, 2020 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Amy Thomas Giuliano (Benjamin, Jeffrey)
July 24, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Moses Shyne Barrow, Omni Hybrid Holdings, LLC. filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-13111459 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Amy Thomas Giuliano. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Lease, #2 Exhibit Receipts, #3 Exhibit Affidavit) (Benjamin, Jeffrey)
July 24, 2020 Case Assigned to Chief Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf and Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Giuliano v. Omni Hybrid Holdings, LLC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Moses Shyne Barrow
Represented By: Oscar Michelen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Omni Hybrid Holdings, LLC.
Represented By: Oscar Michelen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amy Thomas Giuliano
Represented By: Jeffrey Benjamin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?