Fischler v. Peak Theory, Inc.
Plaintiff: Brian Fischler
Defendant: Peak Theory, Inc. as assignee of d/b/a Cub Coats and Peak Theory, Inc. doing business as Cub Coats
Case Number: 1:2020cv03423
Filed: July 29, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Sanket J Bulsara
Referring Judge: Roslynn R Mauskopf
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 17, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER: As per #10 STIPULATION of Dismissal, this case is hereby dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. So Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 12/17/2020. (Almonte, Giselle)
December 16, 2020 Filing 10 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Brian Fischler (Lipsky, Douglas)
December 16, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER: On 11/11/2020, in light of Plaintiff's notice of settlement #9 , the Court directed Plaintiff to file a notice of dismissal by 12/11/2020. Plaintiff failed to do so. Plaintiff shall file a notice of dismissal by 12/30/2020. Failure to do so may result in the imposition of sanctions for failure to abide by Court orders. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 12/16/2020. (Altreuter, Sylvia)
November 11, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER: In light of the notice of settlement #9 , the initial conference set for 11/20/2020 is adjourned sine die. Plaintiff shall file a notice of dismissal by 12/11/2020. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 11/11/2020. (Altreuter, Sylvia)
November 10, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE of Settlement by Brian Fischler (Lipsky, Douglas)
September 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SCHEDULING ORDER: An initial/telephone conference will be held at 2:30 PM on 11/20/2020 before Magistrate Judge Bulsara. The parties are directed to call the toll-free number 877-336-1274. The access code is 6534420. The parties shall dial in five (5) minutes before the 2:30 PM conference. Counsel are directed to complete the attached Discovery Plan Worksheet and electronically file same with the Court no later than two days before 11/20/2020. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the discovery worksheet, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 9/16/2020. (Manson, Eddie)
September 15, 2020 Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Brian Fischler. Peak Theory, Inc. waiver sent on 9/8/2020, answer due 11/9/2020. (Lipsky, Douglas)
July 30, 2020 Filing 6 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla)
July 30, 2020 Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
July 29, 2020 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Peak Theory, Inc.. (Bowens, Priscilla)
July 29, 2020 Case Assigned to Chief Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf and Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla)
July 29, 2020 Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint by Brian Fischler (Lipsky, Douglas)
July 29, 2020 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint by Brian Fischler (Lipsky, Douglas)
July 29, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Peak Theory, Inc. filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-13133450, filed by Brian Fischler. (Lipsky, Douglas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fischler v. Peak Theory, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Fischler
Represented By: Douglas Brian Lipsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peak Theory, Inc. as assignee of d/b/a Cub Coats
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peak Theory, Inc. doing business as Cub Coats
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?