Price v. TD Bank, N.A.
| Wendy Price |
| TD Bank, N.A. |
| 1:2020cv03904 |
| August 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Peggy Kuo |
| Roslynn R Mauskopf |
| Truth in Lending |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Adam Schlanger on behalf of Wendy Price (aty to be noticed) (Schlanger, Daniel) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by TD Bank, N.A.. (Shadek, Caitlin) |
Filing 7
ORDER: The stipulation filed at #6 is so-ordered. The deadline for defendant TD Bank, N.A. to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to October 2, 2020. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 9/23/2020. (O'Neil-Berven, Ryan)
|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint, Extending Time To Answer by TD Bank, N.A. (Shadek, Caitlin) Modified on 9/23/2020 to reflect this is a motion for extension of time to file answer (O'Neil-Berven, Ryan). |
|
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER: A Telephone Initial Conference will be held in this case on November 25, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. before Peggy Kuo, United States Magistrate Judge. All counsel are required to attend. The parties are directed to call toll free (877) 336-1274 and input the Access Code 1453850 at the time of the Conference. No additional security code is needed. Once all parties are on the line, the call will be connected.Counsel are directed to the annexed Initial Conference Order for instructions. By November 20, 2020, the parties must file a joint and completed copy of the Proposed Discovery Plan, a PDF version of which may be found at: # https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/PK-discovplan.pdf Any request for adjournment of this or any other conference must be made in writing on notice to opposing parties, and must disclose whether or not all parties consent. No request for adjournment will be considered unless made at least two (2) business days before the scheduled conference, except in the event of an emergency. Counsel with knowledge and authority must be present. Per diem counsel may not appear without prior permission of the Court. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to ensure that defendant is aware of this conference. (The parties are reminded that, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 1.8, they may not independently record any court proceedings. A transcript of the proceedings may be ordered from the Clerk's Office.) Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 9/4/2020. (O'Neil-Berven, Ryan)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to TD Bank, N.A.. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
|
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Chief Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf for all further proceedings. Judge Frederic Block no longer assigned to case Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such.Ordered by Chief Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 8/25/2020. (Davis, Kimberly)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Frederic Block and Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Wendy Price against TD Bank, N.A. filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-13258177 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Wendy Price. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Taubes, Isaac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Price v. TD Bank, N.A. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Wendy Price | |
| Represented By: | Isaac M Taubes |
| Represented By: | Daniel Adam Schlanger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: TD Bank, N.A. | |
| Represented By: | Caitlin Thistle Shadek |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
