ILKB, LLC v. Singh et al
ILKB, LLC |
Fit Theorem, Inc., Harjinder Singh, Fit Theorem Sugarland, Inc., Fit Theorem Friendswood, Inc. and Ardamandeep Singh |
1:2020cv04201 |
September 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Sanket J Bulsara |
Allyne R Ross |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 Letter by ILKB, LLC (Siachos, Peter) |
Filing 18 Letter to Judge Bulsara Regarding Arbitration by Fit Theorem Friendswood, Inc., Fit Theorem Sugarland, Inc., Fit Theorem, Inc., Ardamandeep Singh, Harjinder Singh (Einbinder, Michael) |
Minute Entry And Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara: An initial/telephone conference was held on 10/23/2020, all parties were present. As discussed on the record the parties are directed to inform the Court as to their respective positions on whether they will arbitrate this dispute by 11/6/2020. Defendants' time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to 11/23/2020. (AT&T Log #12:00-12:20.) (Manson, Eddie) |
Filing 17 Proposed Scheduling Order Joint Discovery Plan by Fit Theorem Friendswood, Inc., Fit Theorem Sugarland, Inc., Fit Theorem, Inc., Ardamandeep Singh, Harjinder Singh (Einbinder, Michael) |
Filing 16 SCHEDULING ORDER: An initial/telephone conference will be held on 10/23/2020 at 12:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. The parties are directed to call the toll-free number 877-336-1274. The access code is 6534420. The parties shall dial in five (5) minutes before the 12:00 PM conference. Counsel are directed to complete the attached Discovery Plan Worksheet and electronically file same with the Court no later than two days before 10/23/2020. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the discovery worksheet, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 10/6/2020.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 10/6/2020. (Manson, Eddie) |
Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ILKB, LLC. Fit Theorem Friendswood, Inc. served on 9/16/2020, answer due 10/23/2020. (Siachos, Peter) |
ORDER: The Motion for extension of time to answer #11 is granted. The deadline for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to 10/23/2020. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 10/4/2020. (Altreuter, Sylvia) |
Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ILKB, LLC. Harjinder Singh served on 9/12/2020, answer due 10/5/2020. (Siachos, Peter) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ILKB, LLC. Fit Theorem, Inc. served on 9/21/2020, answer due 10/12/2020. (Siachos, Peter) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ILKB, LLC. Ardamandeep Singh served on 9/21/2020, answer due 10/12/2020. (Siachos, Peter) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Fit Theorem Friendswood, Inc., Fit Theorem Sugarland, Inc., Fit Theorem, Inc., Ardamandeep Singh, Harjinder Singh. (Einbinder, Michael) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ILKB, LLC. Fit Theorem Sugarland, Inc. served on 9/11/2020, answer due 10/2/2020. (Siachos, Peter) |
Filing 9 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 7 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. Additionally, case is reassigned to Office Code 1: Brooklyn as per civil cover sheet Rule 50.1(d)(2). (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 8 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 H. Singh summons, #2 Fit Friendswood summons, #3 Fit Sugarland summons, #4 Fit Theorem Inc. summons) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Case Assigned to Judge Allyne R. Ross and Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 6 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by ILKB, LLC (Siachos, Peter) |
Filing 5 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by ILKB, LLC (Siachos, Peter) |
Filing 4 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by ILKB, LLC (Siachos, Peter) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by ILKB, LLC (Siachos, Peter) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by ILKB, LLC (Siachos, Peter) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $400, receipt number ANYEDC-13336396, Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No, filed by ILKB, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C) (Siachos, Peter) Modified on 9/10/2020 (Rodin, Deanna). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.