Ramirez v. The County of Nassau, et al
| Rafael Ramirez |
| John Papadakis, The County of Nassau,, The City of New York, Unidentified New York City Police Officers, Frank Leckler and Unidentified Nassau County Police Officers |
| 1:2020cv04287 |
| September 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Ann M Donnelly |
| James Orenstein |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
First MOTION for Protective Order On behalf of all Parties Filed by Rafael Ramirez. (Lichtmacher, Fred)
|
|
ORDER granting #18 Motion for Protective Order -- The motion is granted. The stipulation is so ordered. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James Orenstein on 11/2/2020. (Oliner, Daniel)
|
|
ORDER granting #17 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer -- The motion is granted on consent as to the City of New York only. The City must answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by November 23, 2020. In light of the delay occasioned by the latter ruling, I impose certain additional obligations on both parties that will avoid delaying the proceedings even further: (a) no later than October 30, 2020, the City's counsel must provide to the plaintiff for execution a release pursuant to N.Y.C.P.L. Sec. 160.50 with respect to the incident at issue in the litigation, as well as a release authorizing the disclosure of relevant medical records if the plaintiff is seeking damages for any physical or mental injury; (b) no later than November 6, 2020, the plaintiff must execute any such release; and (c) no later than November 25, 2020, the City's counsel must provide to the plaintiff the names, shield numbers, and proper service addresses of all individual officers involved in, or present at the scene of, the incident at issue in this litigation. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James Orenstein on 10/23/2020. (Oliner, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 17
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by The City of New York. (Ryan, Erin)
|
|
Filing 16
NOTICE of Appearance by Erin T. Ryan on behalf of The City of New York (aty to be noticed) (Ryan, Erin)
|
|
Filing 15
County Defendants' ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Frank Leckler, John Papadakis, The County of Nassau,. (Fernandez, Pablo)
|
|
Filing 14
NOTICE of Appearance by Pablo A. Fernandez on behalf of Frank Leckler, John Papadakis, The County of Nassau, (aty to be noticed) (Fernandez, Pablo)
|
|
Filing 13
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rafael Ramirez. John Papadakis served on 9/23/2020, answer due 10/14/2020. (Halperin, Steven)
|
|
Filing 12
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rafael Ramirez. Frank Leckler served on 9/23/2020, answer due 10/14/2020. (Halperin, Steven)
|
|
Filing 11
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rafael Ramirez. The City of New York served on 10/1/2020, answer due 10/22/2020. (Halperin, Steven)
|
|
Filing 10
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rafael Ramirez. The County of Nassau, served on 9/23/2020, answer due 10/14/2020. (Halperin, Steven)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Appearance by Fred Brian Lichtmacher on behalf of Rafael Ramirez (aty to be noticed) (Lichtmacher, Fred)
|
|
Filing 8
Summons Issued as to Frank Leckler, John Papadakis, Rafael Ramirez, The City of New York, The County of Nassau,. (Attachments: #1 The County of Nassau, #2 Frank Leckler, #3 John Papadakis) (Herrera, Isaiah)
|
|
Filing 7
Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Rafael Ramirez (Halperin, Steven)
|
|
Filing 6
Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Rafael Ramirez (Halperin, Steven)
|
|
Filing 5
Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Rafael Ramirez (Halperin, Steven)
|
|
Filing 4
Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Rafael Ramirez (Halperin, Steven)
|
|
Filing 3
This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla)
|
|
Filing 2
In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Frank Leckler, John Papadakis, The City of New York, The County of Nassau,, Unidentified Nassau County Police Officers, Unidentified New York City Police Officers filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-13356509 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Rafael Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Halperin, Steven)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Ann M Donnelly and Magistrate Judge James Orenstein. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
