Usmonov v. Forcella
Plaintiff: Umar Usmonov
Defendant: Michael A. Forcella
Case Number: 1:2020cv04451
Filed: September 22, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Allyne R Ross
Referring Judge: Vera M Scanlon
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #9 Motion to Adjourn Conference. At the request of the parties, the 11/4/2020 Telephonic Initial Conference is rescheduled to 12/3/2020 at 3:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. The Parties are to call 877-336-1829 and type in the access code 3581283 for the AT&T conference bridge. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 11/4/2020. (Quinlan, Krista)
November 3, 2020 Filing 9 First MOTION to Adjourn Conference by Umar Usmonov. (Craven, David)
November 2, 2020 Filing 8 Proposed Scheduling Order by Umar Usmonov (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Craven, David)
October 30, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER: The Parties failed to file the joint proposed scheduling order per this Court's #5 Order. The Parties are to file the proposed order by 11/2/2020. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 10/30/2020. (Quinlan, Krista)
October 15, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by David Andrew Craven on behalf of All Plaintiffs (aty to be noticed) (Craven, David)
October 15, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by E. David Woycik on behalf of All Plaintiffs (aty to be noticed) (Woycik, E.)
October 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER: As set forth in the attached Order, a Telephonic Initial Conference is scheduled for 11/4/2020 at 3:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Scanlon. The Parties must complete the attached joint proposed scheduling order and file on ECF no later than 10/29/2020. The Parties are to call 877-336-1829 and type in the access code 3581283 for the AT&T conference bridge. Please do not use the speaker function on your phone, remember to identify yourselves every time you speak, and speak slowly and deliberately for purposes of the record. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the court. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 10/8/2020. (Quinlan, Krista)
October 7, 2020 Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla)
October 7, 2020 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
October 7, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants Forcella from Supreme Kings, case number 521034/2019. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Answer, #3 Police Report) (Bonventre, Anna-Lisa) Modified on 10/7/2020 (Bowens, Priscilla).
October 7, 2020 Incorrect Case/Document/Entry Information. The Clerks Office is awaiting the filing of the Notice of Removal in order for the case to be processed. (Bowens, Priscilla) Modified on 10/7/2020 (Bowens, Priscilla).
October 7, 2020 Case Assigned to Judge Allyne R. Ross and Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla)
September 22, 2020 FILING FEE: $ 400.00, receipt number ANYEDC-13400065 (Bowens, Priscilla)
September 22, 2020 Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet by Michael A. Forcella (Bonventre, Anna-Lisa) Modified on 10/7/2020 (Bowens, Priscilla).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Usmonov v. Forcella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Umar Usmonov
Represented By: Joseph B. Viener
Represented By: E. David Woycik
Represented By: David Andrew Craven
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael A. Forcella
Represented By: Anna-Lisa Bonventre
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?