Soto v. Amigo 99 Cents of Graham, Inc. et al
Jacobo Soto |
Zhihui Lu and Amigo 99 Cents of Graham, Inc. |
1:2020cv04622 |
September 29, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Eric R Komitee |
Vera M Scanlon |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File. STATUS REPORT ORDER: Individual Defendant Zhihui Lu may represent himself or be represented by a lawyer. Corporate Defendant must be represented by a lawyer. On or before 1/4/2021, a notice of appearance must be filed for Corporate Defendant. The Clerk's Office is requested to mail a copy of this Order to Defendant. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 11/25/2020. (Quinlan, Krista) |
Filing 10 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File (find attorney) by Amigo 99 Cents of Graham, Inc., Zhihui Lu. (Ramesar, Thameera) Modified on 11/25/2020 to amend motion type. (Quinlan, Krista). |
STATUS REPORT ORDER: Defendants have failed to timely answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Defendants must answer by 11/27/2020. The Clerk's Office is requested to mail a copy of this order and docket to Defendants. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 10/26/2020. (Quinlan, Krista) |
Filing 9 Request for Certificate of Default by Jacobo Soto (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support, #2 Proposed Order) (Wolnowski, Casimir) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jacobo Soto. Zhihui Lu served on 10/2/2020, answer due 10/23/2020. (Wolnowski, Casimir) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jacobo Soto. Amigo 99 Cents of Graham, Inc. served on 10/2/2020, answer due 10/23/2020. (Wolnowski, Casimir) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Amigo 99 Cents of Graham, Inc., Zhihui Lu. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint by Jacobo Soto (Wolnowski, Casimir) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Jacobo Soto (Wolnowski, Casimir) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Amigo 99 Cents of Graham, Inc., Zhihui Lu filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-13439410 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No.,, filed by Jacobo Soto. (Wolnowski, Casimir) |
Case Assigned to Judge Eric R. Komitee and Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.