Singh v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
Plaintiff: Harpreet Singh
Defendant: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Chad Wolf, Acting Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Kenneth T. (Ken) Cuccinelli and U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Case Number: 1:2020cv04883
Filed: October 9, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Ann M Donnelly
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 27, 2020 Filing 9 CLERK'S JUDGMENT dated 10/26/20 that this action is dismissed without prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and fees. ( Ordered by Jalitza Poveda, Deputy Clerk on behalf of Douglas C. Palmer, Clerk of Court on 10/26/2020 ) (Guzzi, Roseann)
October 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Stipulation and Order of dismissal without prejudice. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 10/23/2020. (Greene, Donna) Modified on 10/23/2020 to correct a typographic error (Greene, Donna).
October 23, 2020 Filing 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal without prejudice, respectfully submitted for the Court's endorsement by Chad Wolf, Acting Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Kenneth T. (Ken) Cuccinelli, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security (Yim, Kevin)
October 19, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin Yim on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Yim, Kevin)
October 13, 2020 Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla)
October 13, 2020 Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
October 9, 2020 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Wolf summons, #2 Cuccinelli summons, #3 USCIS summons, #4 US Attorney summons) (Bowens, Priscilla)
October 9, 2020 Case Assigned to Judge Ann M Donnelly. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla)
October 9, 2020 Filing 2 AMENDED COMPLAINT In the Nature of Mandamus against All Defendants, filed by Harpreet Singh. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Chad Wolf, #3 Proposed Summons Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, #4 Proposed Summons U.S. Attorney's Office, #5 Proposed Summons U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, #6 Proposed Summons U.S. Department of Homeland Security) (Cuccia, Edward)
October 9, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT In the Nature of Mandamus against All Defendants filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-13501907 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Harpreet Singh. (Cuccia, Edward)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Singh v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Harpreet Singh
Represented By: Edward J. Cuccia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Represented By: Kevin Yim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chad Wolf, Acting Secretary, Department of Homeland Security
Represented By: Kevin Yim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kenneth T. (Ken) Cuccinelli
Represented By: Kevin Yim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Represented By: Kevin Yim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?