U.S. Electrical Services, Inc. v. Pahoa Express, Inc.
| U.S. Electrical Services, Inc. doing business as Alternate Power Generation |
| Pahoa Express, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv04886 |
| October 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Peggy Kuo |
| Eric N Vitaliano |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The deadline for defendant Pahoa Express, Inc. to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to December 9, 2020. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 11/12/2020. (O'Neil-Berven, Ryan)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Plead (So Ordered) by Pahoa Express, Inc. (Fink, Ephraim) Modified on 11/12/2020 to add motion type (O'Neil-Berven, Ryan). |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Ephraim J. Fink on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Fink, Ephraim) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Harold L. Moroknek on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Moroknek, Harold) |
|
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER: A Telephone Initial Conference will be held in this case on January 13, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. before Peggy Kuo, United States Magistrate Judge. All counsel are required to attend. The parties are directed to call toll free (877) 336-1274 and input the Access Code 1453850 at the time of the Conference. No additional security code is needed. Once all parties are on the line, the call will be connected. Counsel are directed to the annexed Initial Conference Order for instructions. By January 8, 2021, the parties must file a joint and completed copy of the Proposed Discovery Plan, a PDF version of which may be found at: # https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/PK-discovplan.pdf Any request for adjournment of this or any other conference must be made in writing on notice to opposing parties, and must disclose whether or not all parties consent. No request for adjournment will be considered unless made at least two (2) business days before the scheduled conference, except in the event of an emergency. Counsel with knowledge and authority must be present. Per diem counsel may not appear without prior permission of the Court. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to ensure that defendant is aware of this conference. (The parties are reminded that, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 1.8, they may not independently record any court proceedings. A transcript of the proceedings may be ordered from the Clerk's Office.) Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 10/13/2020. (O'Neil-Berven, Ryan)
|
| Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Eric N. Vitaliano and Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet.. by U.S. Electrical Services, Inc. (Myers, Thomas) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by U.S. Electrical Services, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Distribution Holding, Inc. for U.S. Electrical Services, Inc.. (Myers, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Pahoa Express, Inc. filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-13502419 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by U.S. Electrical Services, Inc.. (Myers, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: U.S. Electrical Services, Inc. v. Pahoa Express, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: U.S. Electrical Services, Inc. doing business as Alternate Power Generation | |
| Represented By: | Thomas Peter Myers |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Pahoa Express, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Harold L. Moroknek |
| Represented By: | Ephraim J. Fink |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
