Chun v. Barr et al
| Young Shin Chun |
| Director of USCIS Lee Cissna and Attorney General William Barr |
| 1:2020cv04985 |
| October 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Margo K Brodie |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CASE: 1:20-cv-04985DETAILS: Case transferred from New York Eastern has been opened in District of New Jersey [LIVE] as case 2:20-cv-17562, filed 12/01/2020. (Marziliano, August) |
| Case transferred to the District of New Jersey. Original file sent Via ECF, ALL FILINGS ARE TO BE MADE IN THE TRANSFER COURT, DO NOT DOCKET TO THIS CASE. (Piper, Francine) |
Filing 9
Stipulation and Order to Transfer Venue, It is hereby Stipulated and Agreed, by and between counsel for the plaintiff, Young Shin Chun, and counsel for defendants William Barr, Attorney General of the United States and Lee Cissna, Director of USCIS, that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, transferred to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1406(a). Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 11/18/2020. (Piper, Francine)
|
| Filing 8 Joint MOTION to Change Venue / Stipulation and Order to Transfer Venue respectfully submitted for the Court's endorsement by William Barr, Lee Cissna. (Weinberg, Alex) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Young Shin Chun. Lee Cissna served on 10/21/2020, answer due 12/21/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit priority mail receipt) (Choi, Yunsung) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Young Shin Chun. William Barr served on 10/21/2020, answer due 12/21/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit priority mail receipt) (Choi, Yunsung) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Alex Scott Weinberg on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Weinberg, Alex) |
| Incorrect Entry Information: ATTORNEY YUNSUNG CHOI, As indicated on the screen when filing, please enter the date the summons was executed, and please pick the defendants individually, do not select the category all defendants. Please refile your document(s). (Piper, Francine) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Young Shin Chun. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit priority mail receipt) (Choi, Yunsung) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against William Barr, Lee Cissna Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Young Shin Chun. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| FILING FEE: $ 400.00, receipt number 4653152879 (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
