Iosilevich v. Hofstra University et al
Plaintiff: Ilya Feliksovich Iosilevich
Defendant: Citibank N.A., Hofstra University and Citigroup, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2020cv05085
Filed: October 22, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Pamela K Chen
Referring Judge: Roslynn R Mauskopf
2 Judge: Ramon E Reyes
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 8, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Felicia Dawn Winder on behalf of Hofstra University (aty to be noticed) (Winder, Felicia)
November 24, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER: The pro se plaintiff's time to respond to #4 Citibank/Citigroup's Letter Motion for Leave to File a Motion to Dismiss and #6 Hofstra University's Letter Motion for Leave to File a Motion to Dismiss is extended to 12/4/2020. Plaintiff may elect to file an amended complaint in lieu of responding to these letter motions, and may contact the Pro Se Office at (718) 613-2665 with any procedural questions. Defendants' time to respond to the complaint is extended to 14 days after resolution of their pre-motion conference requests or, if such requests are granted, resolution of their motions. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to the pro se plaintiff. Ordered by Chief Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 11/24/2020. (Caspari, Alexander)
November 23, 2020 Filing 6 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer pending application for leave to file a motion to dismiss, Letter MOTION for pre motion conference requesting court's permission to file a motion to dismiss by Hofstra University. (Mone, Jennifer)
November 23, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer Mary Mone on behalf of Hofstra University (aty to be noticed) (Mone, Jennifer)
October 29, 2020 Filing 4 Letter MOTION for Leave to File Document Requesting Court's Permission to File a Motion to Dismiss by Citibank N.A., Citigroup, Inc.. (Lamson, Justin)
October 23, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Chief Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf for all further proceedings. Judge Pamela K. Chen no longer assigned to case Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Ordered by Chief Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 10/23/2020. (Bowens, Priscilla)
October 22, 2020 Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla)
October 22, 2020 Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
October 22, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Citibank N.A., Citigroup, Inc. from Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County, case number CV-015953-20/KI. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ANYEDC-13568210) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Lamson, Justin)
October 22, 2020 Case Assigned to Judge Pamela K. Chen and Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Iosilevich v. Hofstra University et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Citibank N.A.
Represented By: Justin Ward Lamson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hofstra University
Represented By: Felicia Dawn Winder
Represented By: Jennifer Mary Mone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Citigroup, Inc.
Represented By: Justin Ward Lamson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ilya Feliksovich Iosilevich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?